MHB Brie's question from Facebook (finding equation of perpendicular line)

Click For Summary
Brie is seeking assistance with finding the equation of a perpendicular line to y = 3x + 3, using the ordered pair (1, 1). She correctly applies the slope-point formula and derives the equation y = (-1/3)x + (4/3), but notes that the graph does not pass through (1, 1). A response confirms her calculations are accurate, showing that when x = 1, y indeed equals 1. The issue may lie in the graphing method or device used. Overall, her approach is validated, and the perpendicular line is correctly identified.
Jameson
Insights Author
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,533
Reaction score
13
Brie writes:
Hi everyone! I need a little help with finding a perpendicular line using an ordered pair and the equation to the previous line.

The equation is y= 3x+3 and the ordered pair is (1,1).

So far, I've used the slope-point equation to come up with such:

y-y1=m(x-x1)
y-1= -1/3(x-1)
y=(-1/3)(x)-(-1/3)(1)+1
At the end I ended up getting:
y=(-1/3)x+(1/3)+1
y=(-1/3)x+(4/3)

When I graph it, it's not going through the point (1,1) which it should. What am I doing wrong?

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Brian's question from Facebook (finding equation of perpendicular line)

Hi Brie, (Wave)

You have solved the problem correctly actually! :) When you plug-in x=1 to your final equation you get [math]y=-\frac{1}{3}(1)+\frac{4}{3}=\frac{4}{3}-\frac{1}{3}=\frac{3}{3}=1[/math], so $y=1$ like we want it to.

If you graph it as well you can see the right angle it forms. What device are you using to graph the equation? Perhaps there is a small error with inputting the equation.

[GRAPH]yua730csio[/GRAPH]
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K