MHB Brie's question from Facebook (finding equation of perpendicular line)

Jameson
Insights Author
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,533
Reaction score
13
Brie writes:
Hi everyone! I need a little help with finding a perpendicular line using an ordered pair and the equation to the previous line.

The equation is y= 3x+3 and the ordered pair is (1,1).

So far, I've used the slope-point equation to come up with such:

y-y1=m(x-x1)
y-1= -1/3(x-1)
y=(-1/3)(x)-(-1/3)(1)+1
At the end I ended up getting:
y=(-1/3)x+(1/3)+1
y=(-1/3)x+(4/3)

When I graph it, it's not going through the point (1,1) which it should. What am I doing wrong?

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Brian's question from Facebook (finding equation of perpendicular line)

Hi Brie, (Wave)

You have solved the problem correctly actually! :) When you plug-in x=1 to your final equation you get [math]y=-\frac{1}{3}(1)+\frac{4}{3}=\frac{4}{3}-\frac{1}{3}=\frac{3}{3}=1[/math], so $y=1$ like we want it to.

If you graph it as well you can see the right angle it forms. What device are you using to graph the equation? Perhaps there is a small error with inputting the equation.

[GRAPH]yua730csio[/GRAPH]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top