Brushless gimbal motors vs servo?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the comparison between brushless gimbal motors and servo motors for stabilization systems. It highlights the limitations of servo motors, such as power draw while holding position, limited rotation angles, and gear backlash, which affect precision. The conversation emphasizes the advantages of gimbal motors, particularly their high precision and fast response time, making them suitable for stabilization in applications like helicopters. The need for more accessible information on motor systems for robotic and aircraft stabilization is also noted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of brushless gimbal motors
  • Knowledge of servo motor mechanics
  • Familiarity with stabilization systems in robotics
  • Basic principles of motor control and precision engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and applications of brushless gimbal motors
  • Explore servo motor alternatives for stabilization, including 360° servos
  • Investigate the use of gimbal motors in various stabilization applications beyond cameras
  • Learn about advanced motor control techniques for enhanced precision in stabilization systems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for engineers, robotics enthusiasts, and anyone involved in designing stabilization systems for cameras, drones, or aircraft. It provides insights into motor selection and performance considerations for optimal stabilization.

Jarfi
Messages
384
Reaction score
12
anybody know anything about stabilization systems? I posted the question "Servo vs. Stepper motor for stabilization" before, and I eventually learned that stepper motor draw power while holding position, which servos do not, so I was fixated on servos for a while.

Then I started realizing how rare and expensive 360° servos were, 180 degree rotation is very limiting, then there's the gear backlash, and not so outstanding precision, you can literally see the steps the motor takes in it's quantized movement.

So recently I learned about gimbal motors. Does anybody know if they are used to stabilize say helicopters or anything similar?

I'm thinking because of their high precicion and fast response time they'd be perfect for making a really smooth and natural stabilization, but as far as I know they are only used for camera gimbals.

what are the any sort of motors or systems that are used specifically for robotic/aircraft stabilization? this seems to be really intangible wisdom to find out about. Infuriating even.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You might be farther ahead by checking with photography equipment experts, since they're the ones who use those particular systems.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K