Bubble nucleation and metastable vacuum

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of bubble nucleation in quantum field theory, specifically the transition from a metastable vacuum to a true vacuum. Participants explore the theoretical underpinnings, analogies with phase transitions, and the role of quantum fluctuations in this process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the transition amplitude in quantum field theory as finite per unit volume, suggesting a finite probability for regions of spacetime to decay into the true vacuum.
  • Another participant draws an analogy between bubble nucleation in quantum field theory and the formation of vapor bubbles in water, emphasizing the role of surface tension and energy barriers.
  • A participant introduces the Ising model to illustrate how local fluctuations can lead to the formation of bubbles, with a specific Hamiltonian provided for context.
  • Further clarification is offered regarding the surface tension in the quantum field theory context, likening it to the surface tension of a two-phase interface, and discussing the conditions under which bubbles expand.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and draw different analogies, indicating that while there is some agreement on the basic concepts, multiple interpretations and models are present. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise connections between bubble nucleation and phase transitions.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference quantum fluctuations and energy barriers without fully resolving the implications of these factors on bubble nucleation. The discussion includes assumptions about the stability of vacua and the nature of phase transitions that are not explicitly defined.

paralleltransport
Messages
128
Reaction score
97
TL;DR
I'd like to have a better physical picture of metastable vacuum decay
Consider the decay in a quantum field theory from a metastable vacuum to the "true" vacuum.

Here's i my understanding:

1. For a scalar field potential U(\phi), the transition amplitude is finite per unit volume for a finite energy splitting between the 2 classical minima of the potential. This implies that there is a finite probability per time that some (finite region) subset of the spacetime decays into the true vacuum.

This transition amplitude can be computed by computing the action in euclidean time of a spherically symmetric instanton solution.My question:

Why is this process called bubble nucleation? It is also said that it is related to phase transitions, but I fail to see the connection. Here one is talking about a tunneling amplitude to transition from one (false) vacuum to the real one.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not at all educated in QFT, so I read this wiki page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum_decay).

Water can be found in the liquid phase even above 100 degrees C (at 1 atm). It is in a local minimum of the free energy so it is "relatively" stable. The thing is that, even if the gas phase is energetically favorable, it takes energy to create a bubble because you have to break water's surface tension to create a gas-liquid interface. This is the process of nucleation. It seems that when the "false" vacuum decays, the "true" vacuum appears in the systems like a bubble of water vapor in a bowl of water. So they just use all the know equations that were developed in the theory of nucleation to estimate stuff for this model. To me, it is just a matter of names, but I am not educated on this topic so I am just guessing.

The connection to phase transitions I guess is because of fluctuations. It seems to me that this metastable vacuum could decay due to quantum fluctuations. A similar thing happens in the liquid-vapor phase transition: the density of the liquid fluctuates in the system when you get close to the transition temperature and when the fluctuations are too big you will have that, in some small volume region, the density is low enough that a bubble of vapor forms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff and paralleltransport
Just to show some pictures, you can imagine the ising model for example - spins taking values in $\{+1,-1\}$, with a small ('longitudinal', I suppose) field biasing it so that $\{-1\}$ is the true vacuum. Explicitly, the hamiltonian looks something like:
$$H = -J\sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} \sigma_i \sigma_j + h\sum_i \sigma_i$$
where $\langle i,j \rangle$ is a sum over the neighboring pairs of spins. Then, the configuration of all $+1$ spins is still a local minimizer for $H$, but local fluctuations to $-1$ spin will grow and look like bubbles, for example showed in this plot
1643245554684.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dRic2
springbottom said:
Just to show some pictures, you can imagine the ising model for example - spins taking values in {+1,−1}{+1,−1}, with a small ('longitudinal', I suppose) field biasing it so that {−1}{−1} is the true vacuum. Explicitly, the hamiltonian looks something like:
H=−Ji,jσiσj+hiσiH=−J∑⟨i,j⟩σiσj+h∑iσi

where i,j⟩⟨i,j⟩ is a sum over the neighboring pairs of spins. Then, the configuration of all +1+1 spins is still a local minimizer for HH, but local fluctuations to −1−1 spin will grow and look like bubbles, for example showed in this plot
View attachment 296073


Very cool!

I think i understand now, thanks to you guys. The bubble in the quantum field theory case has a surface tension that is due to the domain wall (analog to surface tension of a 2-phase interface) while its volume is energy favored. A bubble above a certain critical value will be energetically favored and expand. Quantum mechanical tunnelling probability is the analog of statistical fluctuations which produce bubbles of various size, but only the one with large enough size will expand.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K