Building a Cloud Chamber: Tips and Tricks

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around building a cloud chamber, focusing on tips, materials, and techniques for successful construction and experimentation. Participants share their insights on the feasibility of the project, potential materials, and methods for detecting particles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in building a cloud chamber but seeks clarification on the type of metal to use for the thermal conductor.
  • Another participant suggests that any good thermal conductor, which most metals are, would suffice.
  • Concerns are raised about the reactivity of certain metals with dry ice, but a later reply argues that dry ice is chemically inert.
  • A participant notes the potential to explore particle physics, such as muon decay, with a cloud chamber and proposes using a magnetic field to measure particle energy.
  • Another participant confirms that a vertical magnetic field can deflect charged particles, allowing for momentum calculations based on the curvature of their paths.
  • There is a discussion about the need for calibration using a known radioactive source to ensure accurate measurements.
  • Participants share links to additional resources and guides for building cloud chambers, including recommendations for radiation sources to enhance results.
  • One participant mentions that some old luminous materials and smoke detectors contain radioactive elements that could be used as sources.
  • A participant shares a source for purchasing radiation materials and supplies for constructing particle detectors.
  • Another participant expresses enthusiasm about trying the project and plans to share results later.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the feasibility of building a cloud chamber and the use of radiation sources, but there are varying opinions on specific materials and methods, indicating that multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the properties of materials and the effectiveness of various radiation sources, which may not be fully resolved. The effectiveness of different metals and calibration methods remains uncertain.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in experimental physics, DIY projects related to particle detection, and those seeking to explore particle physics concepts through hands-on activities may find this discussion beneficial.

Quantum_Grid
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
http://www.lns.cornell.edu/~adf4/cloud.html"

Has anyone tried this? It looks really cool, and I am thinking about giving it a shot, but I'd like to know how easy it is to get it working, or if there are any other things I should know.

One thing I am concerned about is the directions say to use a "metal sheet" but doesn't specify what kind of metal. I don't know if it would make a difference, but I am curious, and I would really like to try this out.

Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't matter as long as it's a good thermal conductor (which most metals are).
 
Doesn't some metal react with dry ice though?
 
Not really. Dry ice is just frozen CO2, which is relatively chemically inert.
 
Pretty cool; It is somewhat amazing that you can access particle physics, even muon decay, with such simple apparatus.

I wonder if you could determine the particle energy in some way; like for example, set up a strong magnetic field through the entire device. Use a known beta source to calibrate the energy of curvature...and then measure the deflection of the incoming.

I suspect with a video or CCD camera you could get a good idea of the cosmic ray flux in your area.


...
 
Last edited:
I know that, in fact, you can apply a vertical magnetic field in order to deflect the charged particles. By the direction of the curve, you can tell if it's positively or negatively charged, and you can calculate it's momentum as well. I am pretty sure that even modern particle detectors use a magnetic field in the same way to detect charge and momentum.

I wonder if it's as simple as putting two powerful magents outside of your cloud chamber.
 
Yes, it could probably be done , but you would have to calibrate it with a known radioactive source, say, a beta source..

The B field production would need to be strong enough to be homogenous as possible throughout, and also the coil or magnet needs to stay clear of the path so as to not block the incoming particles. (Engineering :smile: )

I believe I read years ago in Scientific American where a chamber could be built with some sort of gel where the momentum could be calibrated by the path length through the substance...but I can't be certain...memory has been clouded by too many years of Cosmic ray strafing.. :biggrin:
..
 
Last edited:
There are other sites that have the "do-it-yourself" guides for making cloud chambers like these:

http://www.bizarrelabs.com/cloud.htm
http://scidiv.bellevuecollege.edu/Physics/Cloudchmbr.htm

They recommend using a radiation source for better results and they suggest some of the following as sources:

...Some (not all) old luminous watch and clock hands will work, as will some luminous paints. Trial and error will determine which ones work. Surprisingly, some older glassware (true cobalt blue) and ceramics glazes are slightly radioactive. It is also rumored that a popular brand of mantles for gas camper's lanterns are slightly radioactive (a Thorium isotope). And a reader points out that some smoke detectors contain a small sample of radioactive americium...
 
Hate to be the guy that bumps his own thread, but really? Nobody has tried this or has recommendations for a better one?
 
  • #10
My physics professor in college had one of these, it worked great.
 
  • #11
Quantum_Grid said:
Hate to be the guy that bumps his own thread, but really? Nobody has tried this or has recommendations for a better one?


I'm waitin' on you to do it, QG...please let me know how it turns out. :biggrin:

BTW, the Americium in the smoke detector is a good idea for an alpha particle source, but its so low energy that it probably won't get farther than about a centimeter track.

Apparently the watch dials are beta sources...

Creator
 
  • #12
You can get various radiation sources from http://www.unitednuclear.com/, in addition to other materials, literature and supplies for constructing various types of particle detectors and such.

Incidentally, Americium as found in smoke detectors is also a weak gamma emitter; in gram quantities, it emits intense gamma rays.
 
  • #13
Awesome! Thanks for the help. I will definitely try this out and post some pics when I can get all the stuff together.
 
  • #14
Wow, there's a lot there. Can you recommend a good source for the cloud chamber experiments?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K