Building a Newman Motor: I Need Help Troubleshooting!

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around troubleshooting a Newman motor, which the original poster attempted to build following a video tutorial. The focus includes the construction details, the expected operation, and the challenges faced when the motor did not function as intended. Participants also touch on the broader implications of the Newman motor concept and alternative motor designs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster describes their construction of a Newman motor with specific details about the coil configuration and materials used, seeking help for troubleshooting.
  • Some participants suggest that the concept of the Newman motor is linked to perpetual motion, which is widely regarded as a hoax.
  • One participant references historical claims about the Newman motor, noting that tests concluded it did not function as a perpetual motion machine and that the patent was denied.
  • Another participant expresses interest in building a different type of electric motor for a toy car powered by a 9V battery, indicating a shift in focus from the Newman motor.
  • Links to resources for building a simple DC motor are provided as an alternative approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express skepticism about the viability of the Newman motor, with some asserting it is a perpetual motion hoax. However, there is no consensus on the original poster's specific troubleshooting issue, and alternative motor designs are proposed without resolving the initial problem.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to the historical context of the Newman motor and its classification as pseudoscientific, but does not resolve the technical aspects of the original poster's construction or the effectiveness of alternative designs.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in electric motor construction, particularly hobbyists or students exploring basic motor principles, may find the discussion and linked resources beneficial.

elitewarr
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
. I tried making a newman motor according to a video on youtube. I have copper wires coiled around a plastic pipe, 200 above and 200 coils below the middle of the plastic pipe. The shaft in between is made of iron and it is quite thick. Now when I connect a 9v battery to the two ends of the copper wires, one above and one below, with some magnets in the pipe, around the shaft, nothing happened. I need help. Where did I go wrong?

Thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Newman as in Joseph Newman? If that's the case, where you went wrong is falling for a perpetual motion hoax.
 
russ_watters said:
Newman as in Joseph Newman? If that's the case, where you went wrong is falling for a perpetual motion hoax.

Yes, I would trust the wikipaedia entry on this one:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Energy_Machine_of_Joseph_Newman"

The test results were published in June 1986 and concluded that it was not a perpetual motion machine, and the patent was again denied. Newman later withdrew the patent. Newman's ideas about electricity and magnetism have been described as pseudoscientific and his claims false.

...

See also

* DC motor
* Displacement current
* Gyroscope
* Inductor
* Singly-fed electric machine
* Synchronous motor
* Voltage
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crank_%28person%29" (person)
* Perpetual motion
* Voodoo science
* Anomalous phenomenon
* Free energy suppression

Voodoo science. I like the sound of that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voodoo_science"
Park uses the term voodoo science as a catch-all concept covering four categories sometimes difficult to distinguish from each other:

* pathological science, wherein genuine scientists deceive themselves
* junk science, speculative theorizing which bamboozles rather than enlightens
* pseudoscience proper, work falsely claiming to have a scientific basis, which may be dependent on supernatural explanations
* fraudulent science, exploiting bad science for the purposes of fraud

The Crank entry is a fun read also:

wiki on crank said:
No argument or evidence can ever be sufficient to make a crank abandon his belief.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If that is the case, is there any method of building an electric motor for a toy car, powered by 9V? Thanks.
 
elitewarr said:
If that is the case, is there any method of building an electric motor for a toy car, powered by 9V? Thanks.

Build Your Own Simple DC Motor
http://www.flinnsci.com/Documents/demoPDFs/PhysicalSci/PS10405.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ok. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
9K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K