Bungee Jumping and Conservation of Energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving bungee jumping and the conservation of energy. The original poster attempts to find the mass of a student based on the energy equations related to the bungee jump scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the energy equation mgy = 0.5KX² and question the correctness of the original poster's rearrangement to find mass. There are inquiries about the variables used, specifically whether to use y_e or y and how they relate to the bungee cord's stretch.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the definitions of variables and the implications of the bungee cord's stretch. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of y_e and y_0, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem lacks clear definitions for certain variables, particularly y_e and y_0, which complicates the analysis. The context is based on an online assignment from masteringphysics, which may impose specific constraints on the interpretation of the problem.

cse63146
Messages
435
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Bungee Jumping and Conservation of Energy

Homework Statement



A bored college student decides to try bungee jumping. He attaches an elastic bungee cord to his ankles and happily jumps off a tall bridge across a river. He ends up barely touching the water before the cord jerks him back up.

Find the mass of the student m.
Express the student's mass in terms of variables given in the problem introduction and any appropriate constants.

98693A.jpg

98693B.jpg


Homework Equations



mgy = 0.5K[tex]X^{2}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



so I get m = (0.5K[tex]X^{2}[/tex])/gy

but this doesn't seem right. Any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What doesn't seem right about it? Looks OK to me. (Not a good model for a real bungee cord, but that's OK.)
 
would I use [tex]y_{e}[/tex] instead of y and X?
 
cse63146 said:
would I use [tex]y_{e}[/tex] instead of y?
What is [itex]y_{e}[/itex]? If that's how much the cord stretches, then you should use that instead of X.
 
It's there on the picture, but it looks like it only goes half way (y_e) of the bungee cord

I tried inputing this:[tex]o.5k(y_e)^2/gy_0[/tex] and it says it's wrong. Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:
cse63146 said:
It's there on the picture, but it looks like it only goes half way (y_e) of the bungee cord
Without a clear definition, we can only guess. It's not clear from the diagram, but I presume y_e is either the unstretched length of the bungee cord, or the amount that it stretches. There's no additional information? (What text is this?)
 
It's masteringphysics (online assignment). It's says that y_e is the length the of relaxed cord y_o is the distance between the bridge and the water and y_o>y_e, so once the cord stretches, would it have a length of y_o?
 
Yes. Now that you know what y_e and y_0 mean, you can find the amount of stretch in the cord at the lowest point. (Of course, the cord is attached to his ankles, so it doesn't stretch the full distance to y_0. Lacking any data, I would ignore that issue.)
 
Got it, thanks again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K