Bungee Jumping: Unraveling the Physics Involved

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter glugger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bungee Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the physics of bungee jumping, specifically the calculations involving spring constants, gravitational potential energy, and the effects of energy loss. The participants analyze a scenario with a spring constant (k) of 50 N/m and a jumper weight of 80 kg, leading to calculations of force and energy. The key conclusion is that while the jumper will not return to the original height due to energy losses from air resistance and elastic hysteresis, the theoretical height can be calculated using the formula 1/2 k x^2 = m g h.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Basic principles of gravitational potential energy
  • Knowledge of elastic hysteresis and energy loss mechanisms
  • Familiarity with simple harmonic motion concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of air resistance on oscillating systems
  • Explore the principles of elastic hysteresis in materials
  • Learn about energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Investigate advanced bungee jumping physics simulations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and enthusiasts interested in the mechanics of bungee jumping and energy dynamics in oscillating systems.

glugger
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
we've been studying te physics involved in bungee jumping. We went to a bungee site, and recorded data, such as length of rope, weight of jumper, distance to fall, etc.

With the data we collected, I've been able to determine spring constant, equilibrium point, force exerted etc.

But I've been having trouble to work out the height the jumper will bounce back up to after reaching the lowest point.

Here's an example:
k= 50 N/m
x= 50 m (this includes the length of cord)
length of cord= 10m

so f=k(x-L)
=50 x 40
= 2000 N

and that his elastic potential energy at the bottom = E grav potential at top
m= 80kg

mgx=.5k(x-L)^2
Eep=40000 J

But using this how do i find the height the jumper will bounce to? I'm pretty sure he wouldn't reach the same height he fell from, due to gravity.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming they stop at the bottom of the bungee then they have no kinetic energy, so all the spring energy goes into the potential energy they have at the top of the bounce.
so 1/2 k x^2 = m g h
where x is the spring extention and h is the height (above the lowest point)
 
but wouldn't the height they return to be affected by gravity, therefore lowering the height he would return to?

1/2 k x^2 = m g h

h= 40000/ 800
= 50m

and this would not be correct.
 
Last edited:
glugger said:
but wouldn't the height they return to be affected by gravity, therefore lowering the height he would return to?

Not affected by gravity. Affected by losses to air resistance and losses into the rope (it's a lossy spring)
 
berkeman said:
Not affected by gravity. Affected by losses to air resistance and losses into the rope (it's a lossy spring)

so without these losses, the rope would be in constant motion, and never stop?
 
glugger said:
so without these losses, the rope would be in constant motion, and never stop?

Not exactly. Without losses, the system is basically a mass on a spring. The mass oscillates up and down, and the spring goes with it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_harmonic_motion

.
 
yes, but it would never stop without these losses?
 
glugger said:
yes, but it would never stop without these losses?

I'm sure Berkeman didn't understand what you were driving at or some subtle point. Anyway, without energy loss in the cord or through air friction, you would oscillate forever, or if you wish, return to your starting point at take-off, with everything else being ideal.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Phrak said:
I'm sure Berkeman didn't understand what you were driving at or some subtle point. Anyway, without energy loss in the cord or through air friction, you would oscillate forever, or if you wish, return to your starting point at take-off, with everything else being ideal.
Yes... If there are no losses (no energy converted to heat) then the bungee jumper just keeps bouncing forever.

I think I'd vomit...
 
  • #11
ok thank you. that solved the problem...sorta.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K