Bungee Jumping: Unraveling the Physics Involved

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter glugger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bungee Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of bungee jumping, specifically focusing on the calculations related to the height a jumper will bounce back to after reaching the lowest point. Participants explore concepts such as spring constants, energy conservation, and the effects of various forces on the jumper's motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents data collected from a bungee jumping site and attempts to calculate the height the jumper will bounce back to, using spring constant and gravitational potential energy.
  • Another participant suggests that if the jumper stops at the bottom, all spring energy converts to potential energy at the top of the bounce, leading to the equation 1/2 k x^2 = m g h.
  • There is a question raised about whether gravity affects the height the jumper returns to, with a participant asserting that it does not, but rather losses from air resistance and the rope affect the outcome.
  • Further discussion includes the idea that without energy losses, the system would oscillate indefinitely, akin to a mass on a spring.
  • Elastic hysteresis is mentioned as a factor that consumes energy, preventing the jumper from returning to the original height.
  • One participant expresses confusion about whether the previous points were understood correctly, emphasizing the ideal conditions where no energy is lost.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the effects of gravity versus energy losses on the jumper's height. There are competing views regarding the role of air resistance and elastic hysteresis in determining the jumper's motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various assumptions, such as the ideal conditions of no energy loss and the implications of real-world factors like air resistance and material properties of the bungee cord. The discussion highlights the complexity of the physics involved without resolving the mathematical steps or outcomes.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying physics, particularly in the areas of mechanics and energy conservation, as well as individuals curious about the dynamics of bungee jumping.

glugger
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
we've been studying te physics involved in bungee jumping. We went to a bungee site, and recorded data, such as length of rope, weight of jumper, distance to fall, etc.

With the data we collected, I've been able to determine spring constant, equilibrium point, force exerted etc.

But I've been having trouble to work out the height the jumper will bounce back up to after reaching the lowest point.

Here's an example:
k= 50 N/m
x= 50 m (this includes the length of cord)
length of cord= 10m

so f=k(x-L)
=50 x 40
= 2000 N

and that his elastic potential energy at the bottom = E grav potential at top
m= 80kg

mgx=.5k(x-L)^2
Eep=40000 J

But using this how do i find the height the jumper will bounce to? I'm pretty sure he wouldn't reach the same height he fell from, due to gravity.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming they stop at the bottom of the bungee then they have no kinetic energy, so all the spring energy goes into the potential energy they have at the top of the bounce.
so 1/2 k x^2 = m g h
where x is the spring extention and h is the height (above the lowest point)
 
but wouldn't the height they return to be affected by gravity, therefore lowering the height he would return to?

1/2 k x^2 = m g h

h= 40000/ 800
= 50m

and this would not be correct.
 
Last edited:
glugger said:
but wouldn't the height they return to be affected by gravity, therefore lowering the height he would return to?

Not affected by gravity. Affected by losses to air resistance and losses into the rope (it's a lossy spring)
 
berkeman said:
Not affected by gravity. Affected by losses to air resistance and losses into the rope (it's a lossy spring)

so without these losses, the rope would be in constant motion, and never stop?
 
glugger said:
so without these losses, the rope would be in constant motion, and never stop?

Not exactly. Without losses, the system is basically a mass on a spring. The mass oscillates up and down, and the spring goes with it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_harmonic_motion

.
 
yes, but it would never stop without these losses?
 
glugger said:
yes, but it would never stop without these losses?

I'm sure Berkeman didn't understand what you were driving at or some subtle point. Anyway, without energy loss in the cord or through air friction, you would oscillate forever, or if you wish, return to your starting point at take-off, with everything else being ideal.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Phrak said:
I'm sure Berkeman didn't understand what you were driving at or some subtle point. Anyway, without energy loss in the cord or through air friction, you would oscillate forever, or if you wish, return to your starting point at take-off, with everything else being ideal.
Yes... If there are no losses (no energy converted to heat) then the bungee jumper just keeps bouncing forever.

I think I'd vomit...
 
  • #11
ok thank you. that solved the problem...sorta.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K