How do we go from BVP to IVP in determining the Green's function?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ivp
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the transition from a Boundary Value Problem (BVP) to an Initial Value Problem (IVP) in the context of constructing a Green's function. The authors derive fundamental solutions, denoted as ##v_1## and ##v_2##, from initial conditions rather than boundary conditions, which is a critical point of confusion. The boundary conditions presented are ##u'(s_0)+\mu u(s_0) = -u'(-s_0)+\mu u(-s_0) = 0:s\in[-s_0,s_0]##. The governing differential equation remains unchanged during this transition, and the discussion raises questions about the implications of altering the boundary shape to approximate a straight line.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Green's functions in differential equations
  • Familiarity with Boundary Value Problems (BVP) and Initial Value Problems (IVP)
  • Knowledge of fundamental solutions in the context of differential equations
  • Basic concepts of differential equations and their boundary conditions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Green's functions for various types of differential equations
  • Explore the differences between Boundary Value Problems and Initial Value Problems in detail
  • Investigate the method of variation of parameters in solving differential equations
  • Examine the implications of changing boundary conditions on the solutions of differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers involved in solving differential equations, particularly those interested in the applications of Green's functions and the transition between BVPs and IVPs.

member 428835
Hi PF!

I'm reading a text where the authors construct a Green's function for a given BVP by variation of parameters. The authors construct the Green's function by finding first the fundamental solutions (let's call these ##v_1## and ##v_2##) to the homogenous BVP. However, the authors determine ##v_1## and ##v_2## from initial conditions (not given anywhere in the physical setup) rather than boundary conditions.

Specifically, the boundary conditions initially presented are ##u'(s_0)+\mu u(s_0) = -u'(-s_0)+\mu u(-s_0) = 0:s\in[-s_0,s_0]##, where ##\mu## is a constant. The authors state that solving the BVP for the fundamental solutions is equivalent to solving the homogenous equation for the fundamental solutions ##v_1## and ##v_2## subject to ##v_1(0)=0,v_1'(0)=1## and ##v_2(0)=1,v_2'(0)=0##.

Can anyone help me understand how the went from the BVP to the IVP? I should say the governing differential equation (not shown here) does not change from the BVP to the IVP.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what kind of differential equation is being solved here, but consider a BVP where the values of an unknown function ##f(x,y)## are given on a circular curve in the xy-plane, and then you make the circle larger and larger to make the shape of the boundary approach a straight line. Wouldn't this kind of a construction convert a boundary value problem to an initial value one?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K