Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Byron Nuclear Gen Station Backup Cooling Pumps

  1. Jan 30, 2012 #1


    User Avatar

    Do any of you know if the backup water pumps have been upgraded at the Byron NGS?

    Also, is the plant currently using the main cooling pumps, or the backup pumps?

    Last year after the Fukushima triple meltdown, the NRC told the Exelon that the backup cooling pumps at Byron were too small to cool the reactor in an emergency, and after waffling back and forth on the issue, the operator, Exelon, decided the pumps were indeed too small.

    So, are the undersized pumps the reason for their decision to release radioactive steam into the atmosphere? Or is this the normal operating procedure in response to loss of offsite power?

    Thanks for any expert guidance.
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 31, 2012 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Source: http://www.newstrib.com/articles/news/nci/default.asp?article=32125 [Broken]

    The venting comes from the secondary side, and the apparently the plant is designed to do just that. The coolant in the secondary loop may contain some tritium from the primary coolant side, either from leaks or from the fact that hydrogen diffuses in metals from hotter to cooler.

    Venting steam is a quick way to remove heat from the primary system. It appears unit 2 was running at full power, as was Unit 1, when it tripped. The current cycle of Unit 2 began Oct 10, 2011.
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  4. Jan 31, 2012 #3


    User Avatar

    I am pleased to read that there is no danger to the public or plant operators.

    Any ideas why "Workers were evacuated" if there was no danger?

    Could the radiation have been more intense near the plant, or could it have been to prevent hearing damage from the sound of the steam release?
  5. Jan 31, 2012 #4

    jim hardy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    "Any ideas why "Workers were evacuated" if there was no danger?""

    my GUESS is it's innocuous, like a fire alarm went off or the office building went dark when offsite power through that transformer was lost..

    were there a release there'd have been notification to public agencies.
  6. Jan 31, 2012 #5


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    From the cited source, "Workers were evacuated and Byron and several other area fire departments were on stand by at the scene as precautionary measures, . . . "

    I imagine that workers in affected areas were removed as a precaution while the plant was being shutdown.

    Meanwhile the NRC will investigate why the plant lost offsite power, and I expect they will review the response of the plant staff in managing the shutdown.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook