MHB -c11.interpretation of division

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Division
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the division problem 99 divided by 33 and the interpretations of partitioning equal subsets versus repeated subtraction. Participants express uncertainty about which interpretation is more beneficial for visual representation. One viewpoint suggests that partitioning equal subsets is easier to illustrate with a picture. Overall, the consensus leans towards partitioning as the preferred method for visualizing the division problem.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Consider the division problem $\dfrac{99}{33}$
a. Which interpretation do you think would be easier to use
if you need to draw a picture?
$\circ \quad$ partitioning equal subsets
$\circ \quad$ repeated subs traction

ok I tried to look up some definitions for this question but didnt see how it related to division
my view so far is I can't see that one option is more advantageous than the other
but would quess partitioning equal subsets
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you "need to draw a picture" then the first lends itself better to a picture.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
0
Views
5K
2
Replies
67
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
21K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top