Cable System Step Function Analysis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the analysis of a cable system involving two dissimilar ropes, focusing on the curvature of the system and the application of mathematical techniques such as step functions and Laplace transforms. Participants explore the implications of using a composite catenary model and the challenges of integrating weight distributions that change abruptly at the junction of the two ropes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes an experiment using a light rope tied to a heavy rope to analyze the curvature of the system, suggesting the need for a step function due to the differing weights.
  • Another participant questions the necessity of curvature, suggesting that laying the ropes flat might suffice, prompting clarification that the discussion is about a composite catenary system.
  • A participant expresses skepticism about the utility of Laplace transforms, arguing that without a differential equation, the integral may only represent total weight rather than a functional description of the system.
  • There is a suggestion to use a singularity function or a step function to represent the sudden change in weight at the junction of the two ropes.
  • One participant provides a reference to the Heaviside step function, seeking clarification on its applicability to the problem at hand.
  • Another participant acknowledges the relevance of catenary curves but points out that existing resources primarily address uniform weight distributions, not the step change involved in this scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and implications of curvature in the cable system, the appropriateness of using Laplace transforms, and the representation of weight changes. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on how to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in existing resources that primarily address uniform weight distributions, highlighting the unique challenges posed by the step change in weight at the junction of the two ropes.

Cyrus
Messages
3,246
Reaction score
17
Cable System - Step Function

Hi, I want to do an experiment using two dissimilar ropes in my basement and see if I can produce some results using a rope analysis. Here’s the set up. I want to tie a light rope to a heavy rope, and be able to characterize the curvature the system takes on. I understand the basic equations involved that I must use to come up with a solution; however, they are based on a uniform weight distribution. Since I am tying a light rope to a very heavy rope, I have to use a step function, and I'm thinking of going the Laplace route to integrate. I would appreciate the help you could provide me with. I don't know if it will work or not, but I figure what the hell why not at least try. The laplace will make it very messy, Unfortunately (I think).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first function I know is that: [tex]dy/dx = \frac {1}{F_H} \int w(s)ds[/tex]
Where, w(s), is the weight per unit length.
and I will state that:
[tex]w(s) = \varrho_1[/tex] for [tex]0 \leq x \leq \alpha[/tex]
and
[tex]w(s) = \varrho_2[/tex] for [tex]\alpha \leq x \leq \beta[/tex]

where [tex]\alpha[/tex] is where the two ropes are tied, and [tex]\beta[/tex] is the end of the rope.
 
Last edited:
"I want to tie a light rope to a heavy rope, and be able to characterize the curvature the system takes on."

Why should there be any "curvature" at all? Just lay the ropes in a line on the floor!

If you are talking about wave motion of the two ropes then please say that.
 
No, this is not wave motion. Its a composite catenary system. Putting them on the floor would make no sense.
 
I don't think using laplace transform will do me a bit of good, because I don't have a differential equation I am working with. My integral would just be equivalent to having an expression for the total weight of the rope. I am thinking it would look like this: [tex]\int w(s)ds = w_1s + w_2u_{\alpha}(s) + C_1[/tex] I am just calling u-sub alpha the step function, or if you guys think that's bad notation, I can use < > and make it a singularity function, that turns on after you pass point beta along the rope. I am saying the two dissimilar ropes are tied together at alpha, and the weight of the rope suddenly 'jumps' much heavier (or lighter), after that point.

So now I have to integrate this mess:

[tex]x = \int \frac {ds} { [1+ \frac{1}{F^2_H} ( \int w(s)ds)^2 ]^{ \frac{1}{2}}}[/tex]

Can someone please help me?

Idealy, what I REALLY want is one smooth function of s that I can write that has a built in step to it and gives me the same results, so the second integration is easier. Is that possible?
 
Last edited:
Catenary

You are (it seems) looking to describe the shape or curve that a flexible rope (cord, chain, telephone wire, whatever) would assume when both ends are suspended and the length of rope between them is acted on by gravity, (viz. catenary, and http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Curves/Catenary.html).

Good stuff.
 
Yeah, but those links are for a uniform weight distribution, not a step change, like two ropes tied together.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K