Calc Equilibrium Forces in Rigid Bodies

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating equilibrium forces acting on a rigid body, specifically a table with multiple legs. The original poster presents equations governing the forces and torques acting on the table, seeking to generalize the approach for scenarios with more than three legs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish a system of equations for upward forces acting on a table with three and four legs, questioning how to handle the additional unknown when more legs are introduced. Some participants suggest considering the redundancy of extra legs and the impact of surface properties on force distribution.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the implications of having more legs than equations, with some suggesting that real-world conditions, such as surface elasticity, could provide additional constraints or equations. The conversation is ongoing, with no consensus reached on how to derive the fourth equation for four legs.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the need for advanced knowledge of plate theory and the influence of the supporting surface's elasticity on the problem, indicating that the discussion may involve complex physical principles.

hellknows2008
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Given a rigid body, to keep the body equilibrium, multiple upward forces act on the body with each a known displacement from the center of mass. How can we calculate the upward forces?

Now imagine we have a table, with 3 legs of neglible mass, the center of mass is at the center of the table, the displacements of the table legs are known. To make the table in equilibrium, we have the following equations:

f0 + f1 + f2 = -fw (F0, F1 and F2 are upward forces acted by the table legs, FW is the weight of the table)
D0 x F0 + D1 x F1 + D2 x F2 = 0 (this is the sum of torques caused by forces acted by the table legs, D0, D1 and D2 are displacements from the center of mass of the table)
the above equation turns out to be: (assuming z-axis is the vertical axis)

[x0 y0 0]^T x [0 0 f0]^T + [x1 y1 0]^T x [0 0 f1]^T + [x2 y2 0]^T x [0 0 f2], then all together gives the following system of equations:

f0 + f1 + f2 = -fw
y0*f0 + y1*f1 + y2*f2 = 0
-x0*f0 - x1*f1 - x2*f2 = 0

We can solve the above by Gaussian elimination or matrix inversion.

The problem is, how can we generalize to handle more than 3 table legs?

With 4 legs, we have

f0 + f1 + f2 + f3 = -fw
y0*f0 + y1*f1 + y2*f2 + y3*f3 = 0
-x0*f0 - x1*f1 - x2*f2 + x3*f3 = 0

However, we only have 3 equations but we have 4 unknowns here

Thanks in advance for any help

vc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no way to tell. You only need 3 points of support. A 4th one is a redundancy. Realistically, on a perfect surface, one of the legs is going to be a bit short, resulting in only 3 legs used for support. On a real surface, there will be a bit of a give, so all 4 legs may touch at once. Then the exact lengths of all 4 legs and elastic properties of the surface will determine the force distribution.

If you don't account for the properties of the surface, you can't resolve the problem. If you do, there is your missing 4th equation.
 
Thank you for your reply

So, with 4 legs of the same given length, and a given elasticity of the surface then, how do we come up with the 4th equation??

Thank you very much
 
It is a very difficult problem requiring advanced knowledge of plate theory, the solution of which depends on the degree of elasticity of the supporting surface, table legs, and table surface itself. See here for some info regarding its solution, but no solution is given.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=138020
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
17K