Calc II word problem(work needed to lift a leaky bucket)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nlsherrill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lift
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a calculus problem from Stewart's "Calculus Concepts and Contexts" 4th edition, specifically regarding the work done in lifting a leaky bucket weighing 10 kg filled with 36 kg of water to a height of 12 meters. The problem involves integrating the changing weight of the bucket and the rope, which weighs 0.8 kg/m, as the water leaks out at a constant rate. The total initial weight is calculated at 55.6 kg, and the solution requires understanding the assumptions about the rope's routing and the implications of different pulley systems on the work calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically the concept of work as W = ∫ F dr
  • Familiarity with the principles of physics related to force and weight (F = mg)
  • Knowledge of variable weight systems and how to model them mathematically
  • Experience with calculus applications in real-world scenarios, such as lifting objects
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of integral calculus in physics problems involving variable weights
  • Learn about the mechanics of pulleys and how they affect force calculations
  • Explore advanced topics in calculus, such as differential equations related to changing systems
  • Study examples of work done in lifting scenarios with varying weights and forces
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, physics enthusiasts, and educators looking for practical applications of integral calculus in real-world problems involving variable weights and forces.

nlsherrill
Messages
320
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


From Stewart Calculus Concepts and Contexts 4th edition pg.473 section 6.6 #15...

:A leaky 10-kg bucket is lifted from the ground to a height of 12 meters
at a constant speed with a rope that weighs 0.8kg/m. Initially the bucket contains 36kg of water but the water leaks at a constant rate and finishes draining just as the bucket reaches the 12 meter level. How much work is done

Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution



I am able to do these kind of problems, but the only thing different about this one is the weight is constantly changing. The total weight of the water/bucket/rope initially is 55.6 kg, and at the end its just the 10 kg bucket left.

I don't know how to approach the change in weight of the water leaking out of the bucket. So far I think you integrate from 0-12 meters, and the distance an arbitrary part of the rope has to travel is 12-x. Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
W = \int\limits_{a}^{b} F\,dr
F = mg
m = 10 + 36 + (.8)(12) - .8r - \frac{36r}{12}
a = 0
b = 12
g = 9.8
 
Ah that's actually quite simple. I thought a new variable would have to be introduced to account for a rate of change. Thanks a lot.
 
xcvxcvvc said:
W = \int\limits_{a}^{b} F\,dr
F = mg
m = 10 + 36 + (.8)(12) - .8r - \frac{36r}{12}
a = 0
b = 12
g = 9.8

That makes an assumption about how the rope is routed...

nlsherrill -- can you tell us what assumption he is making about how the rope is routed, and what would be different if it were routed differently?
 
berkeman said:
That makes an assumption about how the rope is routed...

nlsherrill -- can you tell us what assumption he is making about how the rope is routed, and what would be different if it were routed differently?

Hmm..well there are a bunch of factors that must be taken into consideration I suppose...but as far as the routing of the rope, I imagine it is fixed and stays in a straight line as it is pulled up 12 meters. Otherwise the amount of force required to keep the bucket moving at a constant rate would fluctuate because the bucket would move some in the x or z directions instead of just strictly the y direction. I believe this is the assumption they made, that the bucket travels strictly in a straight line, and the ropes shape does not change.

I don't know if that's what your looking for, but from the looks of the assumptions they made this problem about as easy as they could(besides the changing of the weight with respect to the distance traveled).
 
nlsherrill said:
Hmm..well there are a bunch of factors that must be taken into consideration I suppose...but as far as the routing of the rope, I imagine it is fixed and stays in a straight line as it is pulled up 12 meters. Otherwise the amount of force required to keep the bucket moving at a constant rate would fluctuate because the bucket would move some in the x or z directions instead of just strictly the y direction. I believe this is the assumption they made, that the bucket travels strictly in a straight line, and the ropes shape does not change.

I don't know if that's what your looking for, but from the looks of the assumptions they made this problem about as easy as they could(besides the changing of the weight with respect to the distance traveled).

xcv's solution assumes the rope is pulled up to a ledge or something, and dropped there. How would the equation change if the rope were looped over a single pulley, and pulled from the ground in order to hoist up the bucket...? (that is how it normally would be hoisted anyway, right?)
 
berkeman said:
xcv's solution assumes the rope is pulled up to a ledge or something, and dropped there. How would the equation change if the rope were looped over a single pulley, and pulled from the ground in order to hoist up the bucket...? (that is how it normally would be hoisted anyway, right?)

Ha I'm not really sure! I think it would be a different equation altogether because more rope would be needed in that senario. Otherwise the person on the ground wouldn't have a way to pull the bucket up to 12 meters.

Other than that...I don't know. Maybe some signs would change because the direction of action on the person pulling the rope up is different.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K