Calc Oblique Shock Angle for Supersonic Flow 0-5 Degrees

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the oblique shock angle for supersonic flow, specifically when the angle of attack is between 0 and 5 degrees. Participants explore the implications of using a diamond-shaped wedge and the relevant equations for determining shock angles in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the equation for calculating the oblique shock angle for a diamond-shaped wedge when the angle of attack is between 0 and 5 degrees.
  • Another participant notes that the shape of the object affects the type of shock, indicating that a typical airfoil with a rounded leading edge would create a bow shock rather than an oblique shock.
  • A participant provides the ##\theta##-##\beta##-##M## equation for calculating the shock angle, explaining the variables involved, including the turning angle and Mach number.
  • There is a suggestion to calculate each side of the wedge individually, as the formula can accommodate various angles as long as they do not lead to a detached shock.
  • It is mentioned that for surfaces angled greater than their half-angle, the Prandtl-Meyer function must be used for the expansion waves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the applicability of the ##\theta##-##\beta##-##M## equation for the diamond-shaped wedge, but there is no consensus on the best approach for calculating angles when the wedge is angled greater than its half-angle, as different methods may apply.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the calculations depend on the specific geometry of the wedge and the flow conditions, and there are limitations regarding the angles that can be used without leading to detached shocks.

Harry Fry
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Is there an equation to calculate the oblique shock angle for supersonic flow when the given angle of attack is greater than 0, but less than the half angle?

In my particular practical experiment, the half angle of the aerofoil is 5 degrees, so want to get a variety of figures between 5 and -5 as I know expansion waves begin when the angle is increased to greater than the half angle.

Thanks in advance

Harry
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What shape are we talking about here? There are ways to do this analytically for a wedge, but not just a general airfoil shape. Further, the rounded leading edge of a typical airfoil is going to cause a bow shock, not an oblique shock.
 
Apologies, I meant a diamond shaped wedge.
 
Ah, well in that case it is pretty easy as long as you know the angle the surface makes to the free-stream direction and the Mach number. Basically, there is an equation sometimes called the ##\theta##-##\beta##-##M## equation (you can find it on the Wikipedia page for oblique shocks). It is
\tan\theta = 2\cot\beta \dfrac{M_{\infty}^2\sin^2\beta -1}{M_{\infty}^2\left[ \gamma + \cos (2\beta) \right] + 2},
where ##\theta## is the angle your wedge surface makes to the free-stream direction (or turning angle since the flow must turn that much), ##\beta## is the angle that the shock makes with the free-stream direction, ##M_{\infty}## is the free-stream Mach number, and ##\gamma## is the ratio of specific heats. You can find some online calculators that will do this math for you, but it isn't too bad to just program a solver yourself to do it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Harry Fry
Ah thanks.

I found one online but that is for when the angle of attack is 0. Should I work out each half of the wedge individually, relative to the free stream direction as if the half angle was greater than 5 in my example?
 
Yes, do each side individually. That's one of the nice things about supersonic flows. The formula can handle any angle to the flow so long as it isn't so large as to cause a detached shock, at which point the solution breaks down. Also, if you have a wedge angled at greater that its half-angle, you can still use this formula on the surface that is angled away from the flow, but on the other surface you will have an expansion and so you have to use the Prandtl-Meyer function. It's still pretty easy to do, though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Harry Fry
Thank you very much! You've been a huge help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K