Calcium: Dissolved vs. Undissolved in the Body & Environment

  • Thread starter Thread starter Longwell3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Calcium
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the forms of calcium present in the bloodstream, drinking water, and dietary sources, including calcium supplements. Participants explore the definitions of "dissolved" versus "undissolved" calcium, the behavior of calcium compounds in the body, and implications for health, particularly in relation to calcification in the aortic valve.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Medical-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether calcium ions are always single, free atoms, and if this is the definition of "dissolved."
  • There is a query about the presence of undissolved calcium in the bloodstream and drinking water, with some asserting that no undissolved calcium exists in these contexts.
  • Participants discuss calcium supplements, particularly ground oyster shells, and whether they dissolve readily in water or the body, with some noting that calcium carbonate dissolves at low pH.
  • One participant seeks to understand if all calcium in the bloodstream is in the same form and completely dissolved, while others clarify that calcium ions can be complexed by different species.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for larger particles of calcium carbonate to not dissolve completely, which could affect their absorption and presence in the body.
  • A participant diagnosed with calcific aortic valve seeks to understand the form of calcium aggregating there, leading to a discussion about plaque formation and the role of osteoblasts in calcification.
  • Some participants reference the complexity of calcium deposits and the ongoing debate regarding the mechanisms of calcification in vascular lesions and the aortic valve.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of dissolved versus undissolved calcium, as well as the behavior of calcium supplements in the body. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of calcium aggregation in medical contexts.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about the definitions of "dissolved" and "undissolved," as well as the potential variability in the behavior of calcium compounds based on particle size and environmental conditions in the body.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring the biochemical behavior of calcium in health and nutrition, particularly those concerned with dietary supplements and cardiovascular health.

Longwell3
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
particle size
Regarding calcium in the bloodstream, in drinking water, and in food.

Are calcium ions always single, free atoms? Is that the definition of "dissolved?" (single atoms?)

Does the bloodstream contain any undissovled calcium? how much? how big?

Does drinking water contain any undissolved calcium? Does it all dissolve when consumed by animals?

Regarding calcium supplements, and antacids made from ground oyster shells : Do these large, undissolved pieces readliy "dissolve" in water or in the body? Or do some large chunks remain, roaming at large in the body?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hello Longwell, ##\qquad## :welcome: ##\qquad## !

Atomic Ca is a light, reactive metal-like element. As you already googled, I hope ?

Calcium ions are ions, not atoms. Dissolved means they are surrounded by H2O molecules

Longwell3 said:
Does the bloodstream contain any undissolved calcium?
Does drinking water contain any undissolved calcium?
No.

Any solids containing Ca are precipitations of e.g. Ca(OH)2, CaSO4, CaCO3
 
Longwell3 said:
Summary: particle size

Regarding calcium supplements, and antacids made from ground oyster shells : Do these large, undissolved pieces readliy "dissolve" in water or in the body? Or do some large chunks remain, roaming at large in the body?
Those are almost always calcium carbonate, which dissolves readily at low pH (such as your stomach's environment).
 
I am trying to visualize the calcium in the bloodstream. It is ALL in the same form, completely dissolved? If you swallow a particle of ground oyster shell it instantly dissolves into these identical ions which are all equally available to the cells?
 
TeethWhitener said:
Those are almost always calcium carbonate, which dissolves readily at low pH (such as your stomach's environment).
Thanks. does "dissolved" mean all single, free ions? (one nucleus and and odd number of electrons), no larger aggregates will survive the stomach acid?
 
I , for example, have been disagnosed with "calcific aoritc valve." Trying to understand the actual form of calcium that is aggregating there. How and why.
 
I sympathize. No expertise in organic chemistry, but my feeling is that you are looking at plaque formation in an unpleasant place. The molecules involved are likely to be big organic complexes with some calcium in them.
Ask your doctor and ask for a referral if the answer is vague.
 
Longwell3 said:
I am trying to visualize the calcium in the bloodstream. It is ALL in the same form, completely dissolved?
Completely dissolved ≠ all in the same form. The calcium ion can be complexed (bound) by different species in the bloodstream, but under normal conditions none of it will be a solid like you're thinking of.
Longwell3 said:
If you swallow a particle of ground oyster shell it instantly dissolves into these identical ions which are all equally available to the cells?
Thanks. does "dissolved" mean all single, free ions? (one nucleus and and odd number of electrons), no larger aggregates will survive the stomach acid?
Nothing happens instantly. The larger the particle of calcium carbonate, the longer it will take to dissolve. I suppose that if it's big enough, it won't dissolve completely in your stomach, in which case it will move into your intestines and get excreted. It certainly won't enter the bloodstream as a solid.
Longwell3 said:
I , for example, have been disagnosed with "calcific aoritc valve." Trying to understand the actual form of calcium that is aggregating there. How and why.
Standard disclaimer: we can't dispense medical advice on PF.
That said, this article (might be paywalled) has some information:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888946/
Abstract:
Calcification occurs in atherosclerotic vascular lesions and in the aortic valve. Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a slow, progressive disorder that ranges from mild valve thickening without obstruction of blood flow, termed aortic sclerosis, to severe calcification with impaired leaflet motion, termed aortic stenosis. In the past, this process was thought to be ‘degenerative’ because of time-dependent wear and tear of the leaflets, with passive calcium deposition. The presence of osteoblasts in atherosclerotic vascular lesions and in CAVD implies that calcification is an active, regulated process akin to atherosclerosis, with lipoprotein deposition and chronic inflammation. If calcification is active, via pro-osteogenic pathways, one might expect that development and progression of calcification could be inhibited. The overlap in the clinical factors associated with calcific valve disease and atherosclerosis provides further support for a shared disease mechanism. In our recent research we used an in vitro porcine valve interstitial cell model to study spontaneous calcification and potential promoters and inhibitors. Using this model, we found that denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand may, at a working concentration of 50 μg/mL, inhibit induced calcium deposition to basal levels.

I'm not an MD, but it looks like there's some debate as to exactly how the calcium deposits occur. Osteoblasts are bone cells, and they serve to deposit hydroxyapatite (a calcium mineral that makes up a large percentage of our bones), so if they are present, it implies an ongoing (or active) buildup of calcium deposits.
 

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
21K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K