Calculate Amplitude of EMF Induced by Radio Station

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pepsi24chevy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude Emf
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the amplitude of the induced EMF from an AM radio station broadcasting at 3.20 kW, with a dipole antenna 70 cm long located 4 miles away. The user initially calculates the power flux using the formula for a spherical area and derives a value of approximately 6.145 µW/m². They then attempt to find the maximum electric field (Emax) and the induced voltage (Vmax) across the antenna but arrive at an incorrect result of 3.24 mV. A suggestion is made to verify the relationship between power and electric field, emphasizing the complexity of calculating the actual voltage seen by the dipole antenna. The discussion highlights the importance of checking units and calculations in electromagnetic theory.
Pepsi24chevy
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Sry, i think i put this in the wrong forum last time.


Here is the problem i have been working on.

An AM radio station broadcasts isotropically (equally in all directions) with an average power of 3.20 kW. A dipole receiving antenna 70.0 cm long is at a location 4.00 miles from the transmitter. Compute the amplitude of the emf that is induced by this signal between the ends of the receiving antenna.

I got P= 3200 W
L antenna = .40m

I did A= 4pir^2 in which i get 6437.376*4pi =520748007.7

Next i know that S= energy/(area*time) but power is equal to energy/time, so I did 3200w/520748007.7 and i get 6.145006706e-6

From here i Know s= Emax/2mu_oC so i did Emax = S* 2mu_oC in which i get 6.145006706e-68 *(3*10^8)(4pi*10^-7)*2 and i get .0046332259. Now i know that Vmax= Emax(L) so i multiply that answer by .70 and i get . .00324 v or 3.24mv, but appearantly this is wrong... Where did i mess up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pepsi24chevy said:
Sry, i think i put this in the wrong forum last time.
Here is the problem i have been working on.
An AM radio station broadcasts isotropically (equally in all directions) with an average power of 3.20 kW. A dipole receiving antenna 70.0 cm long is at a location 4.00 miles from the transmitter. Compute the amplitude of the emf that is induced by this signal between the ends of the receiving antenna.
I got P= 3200 W
L antenna = .40m
I did A= 4pir^2 in which i get 6437.376*4pi =520748007.7
Seems correct (didn't check the numbers): the power is distributed over a sphere with radius 4 miles (to be converted in meter of course).
Next i know that S= energy/(area*time) but power is equal to energy/time, so I did 3200w/520748007.7 and i get 6.145006706e-6
Ok, so this should be the power flux per square meter at the level of the antenna (in W/m^2), which you can identify with the power flux of a plane wave by now.
From here i Know s= Emax/2mu_oC so i did Emax = S* 2mu_oC in which i get 6.145006706e-68 *(3*10^8)(4pi*10^-7)*2 and i get .0046332259. Now i know that Vmax= Emax(L) so i multiply that answer by .70 and i get . .00324 v or 3.24mv, but appearantly this is wrong... Where did i mess up?

Check the formula which links the Emax and the power: I'd suspect a quadratic relationship ! But the idea is right:

From the flux of power of an EM plane wave, you can indeed obtain the maximum E-field, which would be indeed the EMF over the distance of 70 cm.
But depending on the sophistication of the problem (the level of the course), one is maybe not interested by what would be the voltage difference between two points 70 cm apart, but by the actual voltage seen by the dipole antenna. That's quite more difficult, and I don't know enough about it myself to help you there.
If you didn't see things like equivalent cross sections of antennae and things like that, then I think your approach is, in principle, correct. But check units and numbers...
cheers,
Patrick.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K