Calculate an Integral: Intro to Superconductivity by M. Tinkham

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vatlychatran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving an integral related to the attractive interaction in superconductivity as presented in M. Tinkham's book "Introduction to Superconductivity." Participants explore the mathematical steps involved in computing the integral of the Coulomb interaction in the context of superconductivity, addressing both theoretical and computational aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks help to derive the integral related to the Coulomb interaction, specifically noting the expression for V(q) and its dependence on spherical coordinates.
  • Another participant suggests that the factor of 4π arises from the volume integral in spherical coordinates, although they express uncertainty about the remaining terms in the integral.
  • A different participant mentions the lack of clarity in Tinkham's calculation regarding the angle between q and r, and the limits of integration, suggesting that the upper limit should account for screening effects.
  • Several participants share their approaches to the integral, including integration by parts and converting to spherical coordinates, with some expressing confusion over the appearance of the term cos(qR) in the final result.
  • One participant provides a detailed breakdown of the integration process, leading to the expression for V(q) and discussing how to handle the limits of integration.
  • There are multiple suggestions on how to approach the integral, with some participants advocating for different methods, such as straightforward integration versus integration by parts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods and interpretations of the integral, indicating that there is no consensus on the best approach or the handling of certain terms. Disagreements persist regarding the treatment of limits and the implications of the results.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in Tinkham's exposition, particularly regarding assumptions about angles and integration limits, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

vatlychatran
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
In the book Introduction to Superconductivity by M. Tinkham, there is an integral as shown below. Could you help me to derive the result? Thanks a lot!

"3.2 ORIGIN OF THE ATTRACTIVE INTERACTION
We now must examine the origin of the negative [tex]V_{kk'}[/tex] needed for superconductivity. If we take the bare Coulomb interaction [tex]V(\vec{r})= e^2/r[/tex] and carry out the computation of [tex]V(\vec{q})[/tex]
[tex]V(\vec{q}) = V(\vec{k}-\vec{k'}) = V_{\vec{k}\vec{k'}} = \Omega^{-1}\int V(\vec{r})e^{i\vec{q}.\vec{r}}d\vec{r}[/tex]
we find
[tex]V(\vec{q}) =\frac{4\pi e^2}{\Omega q^2}[/tex]"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
not 100% sure but if its a volume integral, that's where the 4pi comes from
(dhpi from 0 to 2pi = 2pi and sin(theta) from 0 to pi = 2. so somehow the other bit must equal e^2/q^2?
 
You are right about the value 4pi. When I change to spherical coordinates, I get this value from theta and phi, but I had to assume that [tex]cos(\vec{q},\vec{r})[/tex] (this is from dot product) is not a function of theta and phi.
In fact, I'm not clear with the calculation of M. Tinkham in some points. There is no information about the angle between q and r. He doesn't say about the interval of the integral, and I assume that r runs from 0 to infinite then I will have a result in which terms relating to the upper limit do not vanish. I can set upper limit to certain value because there is something like screening phenomenon but the result is not vanish. For the other term, It seems to be [tex]-\frac{1}{q^2}[/tex].
I like the way leading to this problem because it is pedagogic but solving it makes me annoy. Hope someone can help me.
 
Last edited:
V(k) ≡ Ω-1 ∫ (e2/r) eik·x d3x

Integrate by parts twice:

= Ω-1 ∫ ∇2 (e2/r) (-1/k2)eik·x d3x

and since ∇2(1/r) = 4π δ3(x),

V(k) = 4πe2/(Ωk2)
 
Bill_K said:
V(k) ≡ Ω-1 ∫ (e2/r) eik·x d3x

Integrate by parts twice:

= Ω-1 ∫ ∇2 (e2/r) (-1/k2)eik·x d3x

and since ∇2(1/r) = 4π δ3(x),

V(k) = 4πe2/(Ωk2)

thank you so much!
 
hi vatlychatran! :smile:

alternatively, convert to spherical coordinates, with the "North Pole" in the q direction, and it's a straightforward integration (no parts) :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi vatlychatran! :smile:

alternatively, convert to spherical coordinates, with the "North Pole" in the q direction, and it's a straightforward integration (no parts) :wink:


Hi tiny-tim, from your instructions I get this
[tex]V(\textbf{q})=\frac{4\pi e^2}{\Omega q^2}(1-\cos{qR})[/tex]

in which R is upper limit of r. I don't know how remove the term cos(qR) but at least I get one important thing that [tex]V(\textbf{q})\geq 0[/tex].
Thanks a lot because from your instructions I understand another thing.
 
Last edited:
hi vatlychatran! :wink:
vatlychatran said:
… I don't know how remove the term cos(qR) …

shouldn't it be something like qRcosθ, with the cos disappearing on taking the θ limits? :redface:

can you show how you got that? :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi vatlychatran! :wink:


shouldn't it be something like qRcosθ, with the cos disappearing on taking the θ limits? :redface:

can you show how you got that? :smile:

Of course, wait me, cos(qR) is from the integral of (exp(-iqr)-exp(iqr)) or (-2isin(qr)). Wait me for details

[tex]V(\textbf{q})=\frac{1}{\Omega}\int \frac{e^2}{r} e^{i\textbf{q.r}}d\textbf{r}[/tex]
[tex]=\frac{e^2}{\Omega}\int \frac{1}{r} e^{iq.r.\cos\theta}r^2 \sin\theta d\theta d\phi dr[/tex]
[tex]=\frac{e^2}{\Omega}\int e^{iq.r.\cos\theta}r \sin\theta d\theta d\phi dr[/tex]
For \phi, I have [tex]\int_0^{2\pi} d\phi=2\pi[/tex]
For \theta, I have [tex]\int_0^\pi e^{iq.r.\cos\theta} \sin\theta d\theta[/tex]
[tex]=-\int_0^\pi e^{iq.r.\cos\theta} d(\cos\theta)[/tex]
[tex]=-\frac{1}{iqr} e^{iq.r.\cos\theta}|^{\pi}_{0}[/tex]
[tex]=-\frac{1}{iqr} (e^{-iq.r}-e^{iq.r})[/tex]
[tex]=-\frac{1}{iqr} (-2i \sin(qr))[/tex]
[tex]=\frac{2}{qr} \sin(qr)[/tex]
Then I have
[tex]V(\textbf{q})=\frac{4\pi e^2}{\Omega} \int_0^R \frac{1}{qr}\sin(qr)rdr[/tex]
[tex]=\frac{4\pi e^2}{\Omega} \int_0^R \frac{1}{q}\sin(qr)dr[/tex]
[tex]=\frac{4\pi e^2}{\Omega} \frac{-1}{q^2}\cos(qr)|_0^R[/tex]
[tex]=\frac{4\pi e^2}{\Omega q^2}(1-\cos{qR})[/tex]
That is my result.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K