Calculate Crumple Zone Rigidty?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ22
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the rigidity of a vehicle's crumple zone using kinetic energy and force equations. The user calculates the initial kinetic energy from a collision and applies the equation FcosxΔd to determine the force, questioning the angle used in the calculation. They conclude that the angle is 180 degrees, leading to a calculated force of 691 kN, which they equate to crumple zone rigidity. There is uncertainty about whether this theoretical calculation aligns with practical measurements, suggesting that real-world rigidity might be assessed using a hydraulic ram. The conversation highlights both theoretical and practical approaches to understanding crumple zone rigidity.
AJ22
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Given the change in kinetic energy and distance, find the constant force needed in the crumple zone to stop the vehicle.
Relevant Equations
Work Energy Theorem: W = ΔEk
W = FcosxΔd
The vehicle comes to a stop after the collision so my kinetic energy is equal to (2000kg)(22m/s)2 / 2.
(Ekfinal -Ekinital)
I used the equation FcosxΔd = ΔEk. Knowing that the kinetic energy is -484000J and the length of the crumple zone is 0.70m, I can substitute those values into the equation.
Fcosx(0.70) = -484000.
My question is what would be the angle in the equation of W = FcosxΔd. During a collision the force from a wall acts in the opposite direction from the force of the crumple zone? So the angle is cos180 degrees = -1. Is this right?
So the constant force would then be F = -484000/-0.70 = 691Kn?
That means this number is also the crumple zone rigidity.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
All looks good.
 
Is that how crumple zone rigidity is calculated??
 
AJ22 said:
Is that how crumple zone rigidity is calculated??
In practice? I don’t know. It might be measured simply by squeezing it with a hydraulic ram.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K