Calculate dielectric function from n and k

Click For Summary
To calculate the dielectric function of a thin silicon film from the refractive index values, the formula ε = (n + ik)² can be used, where n is the real part and k is the imaginary part. It's important to ensure the correct signs for the real and imaginary components of permittivity. The discussion clarifies that in optics, the assumption of non-magnetic materials is defined rather than an assumption about the material itself. The relationship between the dielectric constant and the refractive index is confirmed through the referenced Wikipedia link. Proper application of these principles will yield the desired dielectric function.
bad80
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

I am trying to calculate the dielectric function of a thin silicon film from the real and imaginary values of the refractive index, which I have for wavelengths between 300 and 900 nm. If I have the n and k values (real and imaginary components of the refractive index), could anyone advise me as to how excactly to calculate the dielectric function from these values?

Am I correct in thinking the formulae shown under the 'Relation to dielectric constant' section in the following link are the right formulae to use?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that the material is nonmagnetic (\mu = \mu_0), you can just use \epsilon = (n+ i k)^2. Of course, you have to be careful to make sure you get the signs of the real and imaginary parts of the permittivity right.
 
In optics, the statement \mu=\mu_0 is not an assumption about the material being non-magnetic, but a definition. All magnetic effects are taken care of by the wavenumber dependence of the dielectric constant.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K