Calculate Fish Lure Depth Behind Moving Boat

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LTLhawk
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the depth of a fishing lure behind a moving boat using physics principles. The primary formula presented is depth = L × (weight difference / tension), where L is the total length of the line, tension is the line's tension, and weight difference is the lure's weight minus the weight of an equivalent volume of water. An alternative method involves measuring the angle of the line, leading to the equation depth = L × sin(θ). The conversation highlights the importance of considering factors such as buoyant force, drag force, and the lure's shape for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly forces and tension.
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, specifically sine and tangent.
  • Knowledge of buoyancy and drag forces in fluid dynamics.
  • Experience with fishing gear and lure dynamics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of buoyancy on submerged objects in water.
  • Learn about drag force calculations for various shapes of fishing lures.
  • Explore advanced physics concepts related to tension in fishing lines.
  • Study the impact of boat speed on lure depth and performance.
USEFUL FOR

Anglers, marine engineers, and physics enthusiasts interested in optimizing fishing techniques and understanding the dynamics of lures in water.

LTLhawk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me with a formula to calculate the depth of a fishing lure behind a boat traveling at a constant velocity. Known: boat velocity, lure weight, distance behind the boat. Assumption: fishing rod tip is at water level.

Obviously I want to know how far down my lure is. Thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the lure travels behind the boat at constant velocity, the forces acting on it must cancel in each direction. This gives the angle of the line. Using this and the total length of the line gives the depth of the lure.
depth = L \times \frac{weight \ difference}{tension}
Where L is the total length of the line, tension is the tension in the line, and weight difference is the weight of the lure minus the weight of an amount water that has the same volume as the lure.

But I think an easier way would be to measure the angle of the line going down into the water.
When the angle is defined such that it is zero when it lies on the water surface, then:
L\sin(\theta) = depth \ of \ lure
 
BruceW said:
Since the lure travels behind the boat at constant velocity, the forces acting on it must cancel in each direction. This gives the angle of the line. Using this and the total length of the line gives the depth of the lure.
depth = L \times \frac{weight \ difference}{tension}
Where L is the total length of the line, tension is the tension in the line, and weight difference is the weight of the lure minus the weight of an amount water that has the same volume as the lure.

But I think an easier way would be to measure the angle of the line going down into the water.
When the angle is defined such that it is zero when it lies on the water surface, then:
L\sin(\theta) = depth \ of \ lure


No .. I don't think that is correct. The buoyant force can probably be neglected in this example ... the upward force on the lure comes from the component of the line tension normal to the water surface. That must balance the gravitational forces, while the parallel component of the tension would balance the viscous drag (friction) force on the lure. So, it seems like there must be some additional information about the shape of the lure and it's cross-sectional area, or some other way of calculating the friction forces on the lure.

Anyway, the depth of the lure will be given by the distance behind the boat time the tangent of the angle between the line and the water's surface. That tangent will be equal to the ratio of the gravitational force to the drag force.
 
My equation is correct, I have accounted for the component of line tension normal to the water surface in the correct way.
Whether the buoyant force can be neglected or not depends on the density of the lure. If its density is much greater than the density of water, then the buoyant force can be neglected.

The weight and drag of the line also contribute to this problem, although I haven't accounted for them in my equation.
 
This is good stuff... thanks guys.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K