Calculate iron container acceleration in railgun system on the Moon

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the required voltage and current for a 500-ton cylindrical iron container in a vertical railgun system on the Moon, one must consider the gravitational acceleration of 1.65 km/s² and the desired exit acceleration of 2 km/s². The container needs to reach a height of 300 km to rendezvous with a spacecraft in elliptical orbit, necessitating precise calculations for both acceleration and deceleration phases. Historical data indicates that accelerating smaller masses required currents around 5 megaamperes, suggesting that the current for a 500-ton mass will be significantly higher. Formulas for calculating current based on desired acceleration and mass are essential, as well as methods to determine acceleration for given current and voltage inputs. The discussion emphasizes the need for advanced modeling and simulation techniques to address these challenges effectively.
PlanetGazer8350
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Having a cylindrical iron container with wall thickness of 20 cm, and a total weight of 500 tons when filled with its cargo, how would you be able to calculate its required voltage and current input in a vertical railgun system (relative to the Moon's surface), with an exit acceleration of 2km/s², for example? The gravitational acceleration would be 1.65km/s², pulling the cylinder due to its gravity. It should then, at an specific height, for example, 300km, meet with another spacecraft (in an elliptical orbit), just before its aphelion, with the cylinder and spacecraft having a very near velocity. Exactly what exit acceleration should be required for the cylinder to be able to reach the 300kms of height, when it is already starting to decelerate, for it to be captured by that spacecraft (the previous 2km/s² being just an example for that situation)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The current required will be out of this world in the strictest sense. Some years ago (like 15) when I was involved with rail guns, the objects being accelerated were a few pounds at most, and the currents were around 5 megaamperes to obtain about 6 km/s. Your 500 ton mass is going to require an exorbitant amount of current to reach the speeds you want.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I already knew that the required current would be astronomical, but is there exactly any way of calculating the current with a formula? Or, in the other hand, calculate the acceleration with an specific current and voltage input (not in the previous case, but in a different, for example, 5 kilograms)?
 
The attached PDF describes a good bit about the modeling and simulation of a rail gun. While it is dated, the basics have to remain unchanged.
 

Attachments

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top