Calculate limit value with several variables

GravityX
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Calculate the limit of ##P## when ##a_0 \rightarrow 0## and ##M,n \rightarrow \infty## with ##a=a_0n## and ##L=a_0*M##.
Relevant Equations
none
Hi,

I had to calculate the entropy in a task of a lattice gas and derive a formula for the pressure from it and got the following

$$P=\frac{k_b T}{a_0}\Bigl[ \ln(\frac{L}{a_0}-N(n-1)-\ln(\frac{L}{a_0}-nN) \Bigr]$$

But now I am supposed to calculate the following limit

$$\lim\limits_{a_0 \rightarrow \infty}{} \lim\limits_{M \rightarrow \infty}{} \lim\limits_{n \rightarrow \infty}{\frac{k_b T}{a_0}\Bigl[ \ln(\frac{L}{a_0}-N(n-1)-\ln(\frac{L}{a_0}-nN) \Bigr]}$$

So not the limit for ##a_0## , ##M## and ##n## but all at the same time.

Should I first calculate the limit for one, say for ##a_0## and what I got for that, the limit for ##M## or better said ##L## etc?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the simultaneous limit exists, it doesn't matter what order you take the limits in. The eventual answer must be the same. Although some orders may be easier than others.

Where they exist, first calculate limits for components of the formula, and replace those components by their limits in the formula. That's generally valid as long as both the overall limit and the component's limit exist.

So for instance, ##\lim_{a_0\to\infty} \frac L{a_0}## is easy.
Another hint, for the expression in square brackets, use the fact that ##\log a - \log b = \log\left(\frac ab\right)## and then rewrite the fractional expression you're taking the log of as ##1 + \frac{1}{denominator}##. You'll find it easier to take limits that way.

By the way, there is no ##M## in your formulas. I presume you mean ##N##.
 
andrewkirk said:
By the way, there is no ##M## in your formulas. I presume you mean ##N##.
GravityX said:
##a=a_0n## and ##L=a_0*M##.
Messy. First I see ##a_0\downarrow 0##, then ##a_0\uparrow \infty##. Typos ?
 
BvU said:
Messy. First I see ##a_0\downarrow 0##, then ##a_0\uparrow \infty##. Typos ?
Also:
You have unbalanced parentheses.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top