Calculate Mass of Carbon to Reduce Copper(II) Oxide

  • Thread starter Thread starter ViralRiver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the mass of carbon required to reduce 15.9g of copper(II) oxide (CuO) to copper (Cu) using the reaction CuO(s) + C(s) → Cu(s) + CO(s). The correct calculation involves determining the molar mass of CuO (79.5g/mol) and carbon (12.0g/mol) to find that 2.4g of carbon is needed. The method of dimensional analysis is highlighted as an alternative approach to stoichiometric calculations, emphasizing the importance of understanding different methodologies in chemistry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stoichiometry in chemical reactions
  • Familiarity with molar mass calculations
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis techniques
  • Basic grasp of significant figures in scientific calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about stoichiometric coefficients in chemical equations
  • Study the concept of molar mass and its applications in reactions
  • Explore dimensional analysis in greater detail for chemistry applications
  • Review significant figures and their importance in chemical calculations
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone involved in chemical calculations or stoichiometry who seeks to deepen their understanding of mass relationships in reactions.

ViralRiver
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate what mass of carbon you would need to reduce 15.9g of copper(II) oxide to copper by the reaction:

CuO(s) + C(s) \rightarrow Cu(s) + CO(s)

Homework Equations



n = m / ar
(number of moles = mass / relative atomic mass)

If you know any more, it would be really useful for me though ;) .

The Attempt at a Solution



Ar(Cu) = 63.5
Ar(O) = 16.0
Ar(C) = 12.0

CuO = 1 / (63.5 + 16.0) = 79.5g
C = 1 / (12.0) = 12.0g

79.5 / 79.5 * 15.9 = 15.9g of CuO
12.0 / 79.5 * 15.9 = 2.4g of C

Basically, I divided the mass of CuO by the mass of CuO and multiplied by 15.9 to get 15.9g (as in the question). Then, I applied the same equation to C by dividing the mass of C by 79.5 and then multiplying by 15.9 to get 2.4g, which is my answer.

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Your answer is correct (don't quite understand all your steps, but your figures are right). How many significant figures do you need in your answer?

I would have done it like this:

15.9g ~CuO \left(\frac{1 ~mol ~CuO}{79.5g ~CuO}\right)\left(\frac{1 ~mol~ C}{1 ~mol ~CuO}\right)\left(\frac{12.01g ~C}{1 ~mol ~C}\right) = grams ~of ~C
 
Last edited:


Bohrok said:
I would have done it like this:

15.9g ~CuO \left(\frac{1 ~mol ~CuO}{79.5g ~CuO}\right)\left(\frac{1 ~mol~ C}{1 ~mol ~CuO}\right)\left(\frac{12.01g ~C}{1 ~mol ~C}\right) = grams ~of ~C

Please note, that dimensional analysis is not universally taught and in many places of the world stoichiometry is done with ratios.

Which doesn't mean you are wrong, just the OP can be completely not aware of the method you propose.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
22K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
21K