Calculate ∇ . q, ∇ x q and ∇ x (∇ x q)

  • Thread starter Thread starter franky2727
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around vector calculus, specifically focusing on the vector function q(x,y,z) and calculations involving divergence and curl. Participants are exploring the identity relating the curl of the curl of a vector field to its divergence and Laplacian.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss calculating the divergence and curl of the vector function q, questioning the application of the identity involving the curl of a curl and the Laplacian. There is also exploration of the gradient of a scalar function and its implications in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct interpretation of the gradient and the steps needed to compute the Laplacian. There is an ongoing exploration of the second part of the question regarding the curl of a different vector field, with participants clarifying their approaches and addressing misunderstandings.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is a focus on ensuring clarity in definitions and operations related to vector calculus.

franky2727
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
1(a) For the vector function q(x,y,z)=(xy-z2)i +(yz+x2)j +(xz-y2)k calculate

(i)∇ . q (ii) ∇ . q (iii) ∇ x (∇ x q)

verify that the identity ∇ x (∇ x q) = ∇(∇ . q - ∇2q

i have answers of y+z+x,(-3y,-3z,1x) and (3,-1,3) respectivly for the first part but can't fathom the second part, mainly because subbing back in (which i presume is how this is shown) the part where i sub in y+z+x for (∇ . q) what do i now do with ∇ . (y+z+x). the fact that i end up with this leads me to believe that subbing in is wrong but if it is i really don't know where to go, help please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's nothing wrong with 'subbing in'. But you want to compute the gradient of (y+z+x). Not the divergence.
 
the gradient being d/dx, d/dy or d/dz and why?
 
The gradient of a scalar function u is (du/dx,du/dy,du/dz). (y+z+x) is a scalar function. Look up the definition of gradient. Both sides of your identity are vectors. What's the laplacian of q?
 
so then that gets me down to ∇2q=(-2,2,-2) if I'm not mistaken is this the same as doing ∇(∇ . q) giving me ∇ . (y+z+x)=(-2,2,-2) which gives me (1,1,1)=(-2,2,-2) ? (something tells me I'm missing a scalar here)
 
i assume that if i have made a mistake that's not going to be clear enough so i'll show my working ∇x(∇xq)=∇(∇.q)-∇2q

(3,-1,3)=∇.(y+z+x)-∇2q
(3,-1,3)=(1,1,1)-∇2q
(2,-2,2)=∇2q
(2,-2,2)=∇.(d/dx,d/dy,d/dz).q=(y+z+x).∇
(2,-2,2)=(1,1,1)
 
You can't take ∇ . (y+z+x). y+z+x is a scalar function. The problem says you should take it's gradient. Like I said before.
 
To find the laplacian of q, take the second derivative of q with respect to x (getting a vector), the second derivative wrt y and the second derivative wrt z and add all three vectors. That's what the ∇^2 is supposed to convey.
 
so I am left with (3,-1,3)=(2,-2,2)+ ∇(∇.q)

so (3,-1,3)=(2,-2,2)+∇(y+z+x)

so ∇(y+z+x) is just the gradient of (y+z+x) and is just (1,1,1) which makes both sides equal nice on. i am right in thinking this ∇(y+z+x) is dot prod not cros rite?
 
  • #10
Yes, it's just gradient. ∇(∇ . q)=∇(y+z+x)=(1,1,1). As you said.
 
  • #11
orite, so now we have that cleared up I've managed to get almost instantly stuck on the second part of the question. Consider the vector fieldq=yzcos(xy)i+xz(cos(xy)j+(sin(xy)+2z)k show that ∇xq=0

i tried to solve this like i did part 2 of question 1 ((∇x q)) by using the determinant, however i end up with =zcos(xy)+yxz cos(xy) -2 instead of zero?
 
  • #12
How did you wind up with a scalar instead of a vector?? E.g. the x component of the curl should be d/dy(sin(xy)+2z)-d/dz(xzcos(xy)). What's that? What are the other two components?
 
  • #13
i ended up with erm det{(i,j,k),(d/dx,d/dy,d/dz),(yzcos(xy),xzcos(xy),sin(xy)+2z

giving me i((d/dy*sin(xy) +2z)-(d/dz*xzcos(xy)) -j((d/dx(sin(xy)+2z)-(d/dz*yzcos(xy))+k((d/dx*xzcos(xy))-(d/dy*yzcos(xy)

giving me (xcos(xy)-xcos(xy))i - (ycos(xy)-ycos(xy))j + ((zcos(xy)-yzxsin(xy))-(zcos(xy)-(yzxsin(xy))=0

ok so maybe i didnt get that but i do now and that's what matters sorry silly mistake:P i'll be back in 10 minutes when the next question trips me up (joke i hope) thanks for all your help very kind of you :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K