Calculate Quantum Partition Function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the quantum partition function for a system of three quantum spins 1/2, governed by the Hamiltonian H=-J(s1.s2+s2.s3+s3.s1). The partition function is derived from the expression Z = Σ E^(-H*B), where B is defined as 1/kT. The participant correctly identifies eight possible spin configurations and computes the partition function as 2*E^(3*J*B/4) + 6*E^(-J*B/4), confirming the validity of their approach in the context of quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically quantum spins.
  • Familiarity with the Ising model and its Hamiltonian formulation.
  • Knowledge of statistical mechanics, particularly the concept of partition functions.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical summation and exponentiation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the quantum partition function in more complex systems.
  • Explore the implications of quantum entanglement in statistical mechanics.
  • Learn about the role of temperature in quantum systems and its effect on partition functions.
  • Investigate the differences between classical and quantum statistical mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, researchers in quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the statistical properties of quantum systems.

QFT25
Messages
24
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



Consider the case when the three Ising spins are replaced by quantum spins 1/2's with a Hamiltonian

H=-J(s1.s2+s2.s3+s3.s1) calculate the quantum partition function

Homework Equations



Partition function is the sum of E^(-H*B) where B is 1/kt

The Attempt at a Solution



Because this is the discrete case I'm assuming the fact that this is a quantum partition function doesn't make much of a difference. there are eight possibility, two of them are (1/2,1/2,1/2),(1/2,1/2,-1/2) and when I sum them all up I get 2*E^(3*J*B/4)+6*E^(-J*B/4). Is my approach correct or am I missing something subtle because this is quantum partition function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach and result look correct to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K