Calculate Resonant Frequency & Capacitive Reactance

  • Thread starter Thread starter aurao2003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactance
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the resonant frequency of a circuit with a 300uF capacitor and an 800mH inductor, the formula f = 1/2π(LC)^(1/2) is used, yielding a frequency of approximately 10.3 Hz. The capacitive reactance (Xc) is calculated using Xc = -1/2πfC, confirming that it should be expressed as a negative value in ohms. Participants emphasize the importance of including appropriate units in calculations. The overall consensus is that the calculations appear correct, and the negative sign for capacitive reactance is standard practice. Accurate presentation of the final answers is crucial for academic success.
aurao2003
Messages
122
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Now demonstrate how to calculate resonant frequency. Calculate the capacitive reactance for a 300uF capacitor in series with a 800mH inductor.




Homework Equations


f = 1/2pi(LC)^1/2
Xc = -1/2pifC

Hi
I urgently need this solution checked out for my BTech deadline. The question reads thus:





The Attempt at a Solution


where L = 800mH, C = 300uF

so,
f = 1/2pi(800 x 10^-3 x 300 x 10^-6)
So, f = 10.3 Hz

so, Xc =-1/2pi (10.27 x 300 x 10^-6)

Will my final answer be expressed as a negative?
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Thanks a lot in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aurao2003 said:

Homework Statement


Now demonstrate how to calculate resonant frequency. Calculate the capacitive reactance for a 300uF capacitor in series with a 800mH inductor.




Homework Equations


f = 1/2pi(LC)^1/2
Xc = -1/2pifC

Hi
I urgently need this solution checked out for my BTech deadline. The question reads thus:





The Attempt at a Solution


where L = 800mH, C = 300uF

so,
f = 1/2pi(800 x 10^-3 x 300 x 10^-6)
So, f = 10.3 Hz

so, Xc =-1/2pi (10.27 x 300 x 10^-6)

Will my final answer be expressed as a negative?
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Technically capacitive reactance is a negative reactance, so best to express it so. Also be sure to assign it the appropriate units! Everything should have units :wink:
 
gneill said:
Technically capacitive reactance is a negative reactance, so best to express it so. Also be sure to assign it the appropriate units! Everything should have units :wink:

So, my final answer is in ohms and negative. Aside from that, is my working okay? I feel its fine but its the determinant for a distinction or a merit.

Thanks.
 
Harold251 said:
be sure to assign it the appropriate unitshttp://www.infoocean.info/avatar2.jpg

Thanks everyone. I take that as a yes! My sincere appreciation and gratitude.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top