MHB Calculate Resultant of $g(x)=X^3+pX+q$

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resultant
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the discriminant of the cubic polynomial g(x) = X^3 + pX + q. The resultant is expressed as Res(g, g') = -D(g(X)), where D(g(X)) is derived from the determinant of a specific matrix. Participants debate the correct calculation of this determinant, with one user arriving at the result 9q^2 + 2p^3 but questioning its validity. Another user clarifies that the matrix presented is not the Sylvester matrix, suggesting the need for a 5x5 matrix instead. The conversation highlights confusion around the definitions of discriminants and resultants in polynomial theory.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi! (Smile)

I want to find the discriminant of $g(x)=X^3+pX+q$.

$$Res(g,g')=(-1)^{\frac{3(3-1)}{2}} D(g(X)) \Rightarrow Res(g,g')=-D(g(X))$$

$$Res(g,g')=det\begin{bmatrix}
q & p & 0 & 1\\
0 & q & p & 0\\
p & 0 & 3 &0 \\
0 & p & 0 & 3
\end{bmatrix}$$

How can we find the above determinant? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hi! (Smile)

I want to find the discriminant of $g(x)=X^3+pX+q$.

$$Res(g,g')=(-1)^{\frac{3(3-1)}{2}} D(g(X)) \Rightarrow Res(g,g')=-D(g(X))$$

$$Res(g,g')=det\begin{bmatrix}
q & p & 0 & 1\\
0 & q & p & 0\\
p & 0 & 3 &0 \\
0 & p & 0 & 3
\end{bmatrix}$$

How can we find the above determinant? :confused:
Expanding the determinant across the third row:
[math] \left | \begin{matrix}q & p & 0 & 1\\ 0 & q & p & 0\\ p & 0 & 3 &0 \\ 0 & p & 0 & 3 \end{matrix} \right | = p \left | \begin{matrix} p & 0 & 1 \\ q & p & 0 \\ p & 0 & 3 \end{matrix} \right | + 3 \left | \begin{matrix} q & p & 1 \\ 0 & q & 0 \\ 0 & p & 3 \end{matrix} \right |[/math]
etc.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Expanding the determinant across the third row:
[math] \left | \begin{matrix}q & p & 0 & 1\\ 0 & q & p & 0\\ p & 0 & 3 &0 \\ 0 & p & 0 & 3 \end{matrix} \right | = p \left | \begin{matrix} p & 0 & 1 \\ q & p & 0 \\ p & 0 & 3 \end{matrix} \right | + 3 \left | \begin{matrix} q & p & 1 \\ 0 & q & 0 \\ 0 & p & 3 \end{matrix} \right |[/math]
etc.

-Dan

Calculating it, I found $9q^2+2p^3$. So, have I done something wrong? (Worried)

Because then it would be $D(g(X))=-9q^2-2p^3$ that does not stand... (Shake)
 
evinda said:
Calculating it, I found $9q^2+2p^3$. So, have I done something wrong? (Worried)

Because then it would be $D(g(X))=-9q^2-2p^3$ that does not stand... (Shake)
(shrugs) I can't help with the rest of the problem, but you got the determinant of the given matrix correct.

-Dan
 
evinda said:
Hi! (Smile)

I want to find the discriminant of $g(x)=X^3+pX+q$.

$$Res(g,g')=(-1)^{\frac{3(3-1)}{2}} D(g(X)) \Rightarrow Res(g,g')=-D(g(X))$$

$$Res(g,g')=det\begin{bmatrix}
q & p & 0 & 1\\
0 & q & p & 0\\
p & 0 & 3 &0 \\
0 & p & 0 & 3
\end{bmatrix}$$

How can we find the above determinant? :confused:
evinda said:
Calculating it, I found $9q^2+2p^3$. So, have I done something wrong? (Worried)

Because then it would be $D(g(X))=-9q^2-2p^3$ that does not stand... (Shake)

Hey! (Wave)

I'm confused about what you want to find.

The discriminant of a cubic polynomial? (Wondering)
That should be something like:
$$\Delta = 18abcd -4b^3d + b^2c^2 - 4ac^3 - 27a^2d^2$$

What does $Res$ represent? (Wondering)
If it were a $Residue$, I'd expect a function and a point as parameters.
What does $D(g(X))$ represent? I'd expect a derivative, but apparently you're making it a determinant. :confused:
 
Hi,

I suppose $D(g(x))$ is the discriminant and $Res(g,g')$ is the resultant of this two polynomials, given by the determinant of the Sylvester matrix, but this matrix you have is not $Sylv(g,g')$. Sylvester matrix of two polynomials is always a square matrix of order the sum of the degrees of the polynomials.

In this case, you should have a $5\times 5$ matrix
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
615
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K