How Can the Speed of Sound Help Determine Room Temperature?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating room temperature using the speed of sound formula with given parameters: a frequency of 480 Hz and a second resonant length of 0.54 m. The initial calculation yielded an incorrect temperature of -127.6 degrees Celsius due to a misunderstanding of the relationship between resonant length and wavelength. The correct approach involves using the formula L = (3/4)λ to accurately determine the wavelength before applying it to the speed of sound equation v = fλ. Clarification on the correct use of these formulas is essential for accurate temperature calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the speed of sound formula v = 331 + (0.60)T
  • Knowledge of wave properties, specifically frequency and wavelength
  • Familiarity with the concept of resonant lengths in open-closed air columns
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between resonant length and wavelength in open-closed air columns
  • Learn how to derive the speed of sound in different mediums
  • Explore the implications of temperature on sound speed
  • Practice solving problems involving the speed of sound and temperature calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, educators teaching acoustics, and anyone interested in the practical applications of sound speed in temperature measurement.

SelenaT
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the room temperature by using the speed of sound formula and using the given values.

Known Data:
Frequency = 480 Hz
2nd Resonant length = 54cm or 0.54m

Homework Equations


v = 331 + (0.60)T
T = (v - 331)/0.60

v = fλ

(Open-Closed air column)
L = (3/4)λ

The Attempt at a Solution



(1) v = fλ
= 480Hz (0.53m)
= 254.4m/s

(2) T = (254.4m/s) - 331 / 0.60
= -127.6 degrees celsius[/B]

I highly doubt the temperature is this low. I realized that I used the wavelength as the resonant length so, I decided to solve for λ using the resonant length. I did the same process again but using the calculated λ but it didnt work either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand how you got 0.53m. You don't seem to have used the ##L=(3/4)\lambda## formula.
 
haruspex said:
I don't understand how you got 0.53m. You don't seem to have used the ##L=(3/4)\lambda## formula.

Sorry, forgot to give a little context. I will remember next time.

This is a follow up question for an experiment that I did. Using an open-closed air column, I found that the second resonant length was 0.53m
 
SelenaT said:
Sorry, forgot to give a little context. I will remember next time.

This is a follow up question for an experiment that I did. Using an open-closed air column, I found that the second resonant length was 0.53m
OK, but that's L, not ##\lambda##. You plugged that value into your ##v=f\lambda## formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K