Calculate scaled down human model weight for practical experiment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the weight of a scaled-down human model at a 1:20 ratio, specifically a model with a height of 9 cm. Participants suggest using the average density of a human, estimated at approximately 1,000 kg/m³, to derive the weight. The consensus indicates that the weight scales with the volume, resulting in a mass of about 10 grams for the 9 cm model, as the volume decreases by a factor of 8000. Additionally, considerations regarding structural integrity and the implications of scaling on physical properties are discussed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of density and its calculation
  • Familiarity with the concept of scaling in physics
  • Knowledge of body mass index (BMI) and its limitations
  • Basic principles of gravitational force and its relation to mass
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of scaling laws in structural engineering
  • Explore the relationship between volume, density, and weight in physical models
  • Learn about the limitations of BMI when applied to scaled models
  • Investigate materials suitable for creating scaled models that maintain structural integrity
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mechanical engineers, model makers, and researchers involved in physical simulations or experiments requiring scaled human models.

  • #31
Viky1147 said:
And by guidance means, i meant if you couldn't answer you could direct me towards the answer is what i meant.
I have counted several simple answers in this thread - including one from me. There are also the reasonings behind them. Your 'figurine' could be made of any material that's just a bit less dense than water and you could test this by checking it floats with only a small proportion above water.

It seems that you have ignored the questions that we have asked but many of them could be very relevant if you plan to do anything more than just stand this figure on your 'apparatus'. Did you consider re-stating your question to make it clearer what you really mean? It appears that you want to keep this project a secret and so the information you have taken from the thread may let you down.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444, berkeman, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Viky1147 said:
Now don't say data is insufficient. This is what the requirement is.
The data is insufficient. We need to know what particular aspect you are attempting to model.

If you were trying to model pressure on shoe material then scaling the weight down by a factor of 202 = 400 could be appropriate. That would preserve the pressure per square inch on the shoe material.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
  • #33
jbriggs444 said:
The data is insufficient. We need to know what particular aspect you are attempting to model.

If you were trying to model pressure on shoe material then scaling the weight down by a factor of 202 = 400 could be appropriate. That would preserve the pressure per square inch on the shoe material.
My question is this
I need to Scale down a human model (height & weight) for a study.
I couldn't experiment it on a 1:1 model, due to cost.
So, I need a human model of 9cm height.

What data is missing here in your proposed calculation?
 
  • #34
Viky1147 said:
My question is this
I need to Scale down a human model (height & weight) for a study.
I couldn't experiment it on a 1:1 model, due to cost.
So, I need a human model of 9cm height.

What data is missing here in your proposed calculation?
The purpose and methods of the study. If you want the scale model to behave similarly to an unscaled human, those details matter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
  • #35
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
  • #36
We seem to be stuck on the spot and reasoning becomes ad hominem from the OP's side.

I further suppose that there is no answer to the question, especially since ...
jbriggs444 said:
The purpose and methods of the study. If you want the scale model to behave similarly to an unscaled human, those details matter.
... remains unanswered.

This is the standard trick for arguments: missing details followed by ad hominem responses demanding to leave the discussion. However, it is not the way we debate questions on PF.

Thread remains closed.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: hmmm27, jbriggs444, Delta2 and 4 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K