Calculate the magnetic field from the vector potential

arjun_ar
Messages
3
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Given the magnetic vector potential of a current carrying loop in cylindrical coordinate system, derive the axial and radial magnetic fields.
Relevant Equations
Please read ahead.
I am trying to derive radial and axial magnetic fields of a current carrying loop from its magnetic vector potential. So far, I have succeeded in deriving the radial field but axial field derivation gives me trouble.
Z2N67kE.png


My derivation of radial field (eq 1) can be found here.

Can anyone point out where I went wrong in the derivation of axial field?

My derivation of axial field is given below.

EjnkUB1.png


In case the images are blurred, you can see them here and here.

On comparing, Eq.7 with Eq.2, the coefficient of E do not match.

I have done this derivation multiple times, yet arrive at the same answer.
Can anyone point me where I went wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm is it dead sure that K and E are independent of ##\rho,z##? So you can treat them as constants when taking the derivatives with respect to those variables?
 
I think the mistake is here:

1658095752159.png


The two expressions circled in green are not equivalent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you have typographical errors in your equations (1) and (2)? Should the denominators inside the square brackets be ##(a-\rho)^2 + z^2## instead of ##(a+\rho)^2 + z^2##?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes arjun_ar and Delta2
Delta2 said:
Hmm is it dead sure that K and E are independent of ##\rho,z##? So you can treat them as constants when taking the derivatives with respect to those variables?
Thank you for your response.
I think they are independent of ##\rho,z##. In my derivation of radial field, I have treated them to be independent of ##z## and arrived at the exact solution.
 
TSny said:
I think the mistake is here:

View attachment 304311

The two expressions circled in green are not equivalent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you have typographical errors in your equations (1) and (2)? Should the denominators inside the square brackets be ##(a-\rho)^2 + z^2## instead of ##(a+\rho)^2 + z^2##?
Thank you! This solves my problem. I don't know how I missed it!

There is indeed a typographical error for equations (1) and (2). I will update them and provide a full derivation for axial field asap.
 
  • Like
Likes TSny and Delta2
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top