Calculate the magnetic field from the vector potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving the magnetic field from the magnetic vector potential for a current-carrying loop. The user successfully derived the radial magnetic field but encountered issues with the axial magnetic field derivation. Key errors identified include typographical mistakes in equations (1) and (2), specifically regarding the denominators, which should be ##(a-\rho)^2 + z^2## instead of ##(a+\rho)^2 + z^2##. The user confirmed that treating constants K and E as independent of ##\rho## and ##z## was crucial in achieving the correct solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic vector potential
  • Familiarity with magnetic field calculations
  • Knowledge of mathematical derivation techniques
  • Proficiency in handling equations involving variables like ##\rho## and ##z##
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of magnetic vector potential in electromagnetic theory
  • Study typographical error identification in mathematical equations
  • Learn about the implications of treating constants in variable-dependent equations
  • Explore advanced topics in magnetic field calculations for current-carrying loops
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and researchers working on electromagnetic fields and vector potentials will benefit from this discussion.

arjun_ar
Messages
3
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Given the magnetic vector potential of a current carrying loop in cylindrical coordinate system, derive the axial and radial magnetic fields.
Relevant Equations
Please read ahead.
I am trying to derive radial and axial magnetic fields of a current carrying loop from its magnetic vector potential. So far, I have succeeded in deriving the radial field but axial field derivation gives me trouble.
Z2N67kE.png


My derivation of radial field (eq 1) can be found here.

Can anyone point out where I went wrong in the derivation of axial field?

My derivation of axial field is given below.

EjnkUB1.png


In case the images are blurred, you can see them here and here.

On comparing, Eq.7 with Eq.2, the coefficient of E do not match.

I have done this derivation multiple times, yet arrive at the same answer.
Can anyone point me where I went wrong?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm is it dead sure that K and E are independent of ##\rho,z##? So you can treat them as constants when taking the derivatives with respect to those variables?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arjun_ar
I think the mistake is here:

1658095752159.png


The two expressions circled in green are not equivalent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you have typographical errors in your equations (1) and (2)? Should the denominators inside the square brackets be ##(a-\rho)^2 + z^2## instead of ##(a+\rho)^2 + z^2##?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: arjun_ar and Delta2
Delta2 said:
Hmm is it dead sure that K and E are independent of ##\rho,z##? So you can treat them as constants when taking the derivatives with respect to those variables?
Thank you for your response.
I think they are independent of ##\rho,z##. In my derivation of radial field, I have treated them to be independent of ##z## and arrived at the exact solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
TSny said:
I think the mistake is here:

View attachment 304311

The two expressions circled in green are not equivalent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you have typographical errors in your equations (1) and (2)? Should the denominators inside the square brackets be ##(a-\rho)^2 + z^2## instead of ##(a+\rho)^2 + z^2##?
Thank you! This solves my problem. I don't know how I missed it!

There is indeed a typographical error for equations (1) and (2). I will update them and provide a full derivation for axial field asap.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny and Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
783
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K