Calculate the oxidation number of carbon

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kushal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon Oxidation
Click For Summary
The oxidation number of carbon in the products of the first reaction is determined to be +4. The first reaction is more exothermic, releasing -132 kJ/mol compared to -68 kJ/mol for the second reaction, which suggests it may be a more effective fuel source. However, the first reaction also produces more CO2, raising environmental concerns. Additionally, the separation of products in the first reaction (methane and CO2) may be easier than distilling ethanol from the broth in the second reaction. Overall, the discussion highlights the trade-offs between energy yield and environmental impact in fermentation processes.
Kushal
Messages
438
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



C6H12O6\rightarrow 3CO2 + 3CH4 \DeltaH = -132 kJmol-1


C6H12O6\rightarrow 2CO2 + 2C2H5OH \DeltaH = -68 kJmol-1

1. Calculate the oxidation number of carbon in each of the products of the first reaction.

2. Comment on the relative advantages and disadvantages of these 2 types of fermentation as sources of fuel from glucose.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



1. i found carbon to be at an oxidation state of +4 in the products of the first reaction.

2. the first reaction releases more energy than the second one. it is more exothermic.

the second part contains 3 marks, so i think i need 2 more points, but i can't find anything more.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I guess a disadvantage would be the production of CO2 everytime you break down glucose. So while it does release more energy it releases more CO2 as well.
 
Your first answer is incomplete. There are two products...


In the first reaction, you have a mixture of two gases and you will have to separate them unless you want to use the methane contaminated with CO2. In the second reaction, the products are dissolved in the broth (beer?) and must be distilled to be purified. Which process do you think is easier?

What advantage/disadvantage is there for a process that liberates more energy in the production of one of these fuels? Is that energy available for power production or is it wasted in the production of the fuel?
 
i think that if the process producing the fuel liberates more energy, then on oxidation of the fuel, less energy will be liberated.

and, i think it is easier to separate the methane from CO2 (maybe cooling the mixture to make the CO2 solidify?!) than taking the ethanol out of the broth.

i had in mind that it was that energy released from the above reactions that were used, and not the energy from the further oxidation of methane or ethanol. :-S

but what you say makes much more sense. thnks
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
18K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K