Calculate the power delivered to each resistor

  • Thread starter Thread starter bodkin.thomas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Resistor
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the power delivered to various resistors in a circuit involving multiple voltage sources and resistors. The problem is set within the context of applying Kirchhoff's Rules to analyze the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss breaking the circuit into loops and applying Kirchhoff's loop rule, with some uncertainty about the direction of currents and the number of loops needed.
  • Questions arise regarding the application of the point rule with multiple currents and the validity of the assumed current directions.
  • Some participants express confusion about how to handle multiple branch currents and the implications for their calculations.
  • There are attempts to derive equations for the currents and discussions about substituting values into power formulas.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their calculations and questioning the accuracy of their results. Some guidance has been offered regarding the handling of currents and the formulation of equations, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct values or methods yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the circuit and the challenge of solving for multiple variables simultaneously. There is an acknowledgment of potential mistakes in calculations and the need for careful verification of results.

bodkin.thomas
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Here is the accompanying diagram.


Calculate the power delivered to each of the resistors in Figure P28.28 (E = 55 V, R = 5.0 .)

  1. ____W (2.0 resistor in loop with 55 V source.)
  2. ____W (5.0 resistor in loop with 55 V source.)
  3. ____W (5.0 resistor in loop with 20 V source.)
  4. ____W (2.0 resistor in loop with 20 V source.)


Homework Equations



Kirchhoff's Rules
ƩIenter - Ʃleave = 0

ƩEmf - ƩIR = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9172399/Pictures/001.jpg I basically broke the problem into the six loops and wrote equations based on the loop rule. I've never encountered anything near as complex as this, so I'm at a loss of what to do...

How does the point rule work in this case with so many currents? Did I draw the currents in the right direction? I haven't the slightest idea...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bodkin.thomas said:

Homework Statement



Here is the accompanying diagram.


Calculate the power delivered to each of the resistors in Figure P28.28 (E = 55 V, R = 5.0 .)

  1. ____W (2.0 resistor in loop with 55 V source.)
  2. ____W (5.0 resistor in loop with 55 V source.)
  3. ____W (5.0 resistor in loop with 20 V source.)
  4. ____W (2.0 resistor in loop with 20 V source.)


Homework Equations



Kirchhoff's Rules
ƩIenter - Ʃleave = 0

ƩEmf - ƩIR = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9172399/Pictures/001.jpg I basically broke the problem into the six loops and wrote equations based on the loop rule. I've never encountered anything near as complex as this, so I'm at a loss of what to do...

How does the point rule work in this case with so many currents? Did I draw the currents in the right direction? I haven't the slightest idea...

You only need enough loops so that all of the components are traversed by at least one. So in this case you can get away with three loops. Your loops designated I, II, and III would suffice.

The directions that you assume for the currents won't matter so long as you follow the rules about potential drops occurring in the direction of assumed current flow as you go around the loops.
 
Ok, solving the equations, I got the following

I1 = ~ 12.2

I2 = ~ 6.11

I3 = ~ 6.11

I4 = ~ 25.3

So now, using P=IV, can I simply substitute the I values I got above and the voltage that the provide in each part? Or is it not that simple?
 
Last edited:
bodkin.thomas said:
Ok, solving the equations, I got the following

I1 = ~ 12.2

I2 = ~ 6.11

I3 = ~ 6.11

I4 = ~ 25.3

So now, using P=IV, can I simply substitute the I values I got above and the voltage that the provide in each part? Or is it not that simple?

I think you'll have to show your work. Those currents don't match what I'm seeing for this circuit.

Once you have the currents though each component you can find the power dissipated using a suitable version of the power formula. Simplest would be P = I2R.
 
Here's what I did

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9172399/Pictures/001%20%282%29.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
bodkin.thomas said:
Here's what I did

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9172399/Pictures/001%20%282%29.jpg

Sorry, I don't see where you're handling the current in the final branch (with the 20 V source). There should be four branch currents, one for each branch:

attachment.php?attachmentid=45917&stc=1&d=1333669681.gif


That makes I1 = I2 + I3 + I4.

You could also write a single KCL node equation and then find the currents using the node voltage.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    3.3 KB · Views: 2,497
Last edited by a moderator:
Well there's one problem. I wasn't sure how the rule would function in this case because there were four currents. I'll give it another try with that new rule and come back when I have something to show.
 
Alright, here's another attempt...

I1 = ~ 18.0
I2 = ~ 1.79
I3 = ~ 1.79
I4 = ~ 14.5

What I did might work or I might have done something illegal...

I took

55-7I2-2I3-2I4
-20 -5I3+2I4
-5I2+5I3

added them and got

35 - 12I2 -2I3 = 0

and then solved for I3

I3 = 12.5-6I2

Then I substituted that into

-5I2 + 5I3 = 0

and got my answers...

I've never solved for 4 variables, so I'm kinda grasping at straws.
 
Your equations look fine, but your solutions are off.
 
  • #10
How about these?

I1 = 18.0
I2 = 3.8
I3 = 3.8
I4 = 10.5
 
  • #11
bodkin.thomas said:
How about these?

I1 = 18.0
I2 = 3.8
I3 = 3.8
I4 = 10.5

Nope.

Let's take your equations:

55 - 7I2 - 2I3 - 2I4 = 0
-20 - 5I3 + 2I4 = 0
-5I2 + 5I3 = 0

Note that the last equation implies that I2 = I3. So replace I2 in the first equation with I3, and discard the last equation since it's served its purpose. You're now left with two equations in two unknowns:

55 - 9I3 - 2I4 = 0
-20 - 5I3 + 2I4 = 0

continue...
 
  • #12
Thanks for your help tonight! Made a mistake typing the matrix in my calculator... :redface:
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K