Calculate the tension in the string

  • Thread starter Thread starter ssj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Tension
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the tension in a string in the context of torque and equilibrium, specifically involving a beam with forces applied at various points. Participants are analyzing the effects of these forces and how they relate to the moments generated about a pivot point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between torque and tension, attempting to set up equations based on the moments created by forces acting on the beam. There are questions about the correct application of trigonometric functions in the context of tension and torque.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and attempting to clarify their understanding of the concepts involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of sine and cosine in the context of tension, but no consensus has been reached on the final calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints regarding the information provided, such as the length of the beam and the specific points at which forces are applied. Participants are questioning how these factors influence their calculations and the assumptions they must make.

ssj
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
1. Calculate the tension in the string T in each of the following situations.
In all calculations ignore the mass of the beam.


http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/7291/43422126ru2.th.jpg


2. Moment=F X Perpendicular Distance and Basic Trigonometry



3.I have tried 200N X 0.5m=100 100/Cos30

Help is much apperchated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ssj said:
I have tried 200N X 0.5m=100 100/Cos30
I understand the left side of this equation: the clockwise torque due to the 200 N force. The right side should be the counter-clockwise torque due to the tension of the cable.

Correct this equation, rewriting the right hand side in terms of T (tension). Then solve for T.
 
Doc Al said:
I understand the left side of this equation: the clockwise torque due to the 200 N force. The right side should be the counter-clockwise torque due to the tension of the cable.

Correct this equation, rewriting the right hand side in terms of T (tension). Then solve for T.

I think i have found the solution by calculating the "opp" tan30 X 0.5 = 0.2886 from there onward we do 200 X 0.5= 100/0.2886 =346.5/cos 30 = 400 N

However now I am stuck on an similar equation of http://img374.imageshack.us/img374/3332/22917237wh9.th.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ssj said:
I think i have found the solution by calculating the "opp" tan30 X 0.5 = 0.2886 from there onward we do 200 X 0.5= 100/0.2886 =346.5/cos 30 = 400 N
Don't really understand what you did there with tangents and cosines. All you need is:
0.5*200 = 0.5*T*sin(30)
which gives you T = 400.

However now I am stuck on an similar equation of...
Solve it in the same way. The only difference is the moment arm associated with the 200 N force.

I strongly suggest you adopt a systematic approach, like the one I used.
 
But why would you use sine30 wouldn't that work out the "opp"?. Due to the fact the T is on the hypoteanus.
 
ssj said:
But why would you use sine30 wouldn't that work out the "opp"?. Due to the fact the T is on the hypoteanus.
You want the component of T perpendicular to the beam, which in this case means [itex]T\sin {30}[/itex].
 
But why would T need to become perpendicular ? Also for question 2 how am I ment to work it out without the given length ?
 
Last edited:
ssj said:
But why would T need to become perpendicular ?
Because you are finding the torque (moment) it generates about the pivot point. Do you understand the definition of moment?
 
Doc Al said:
Because you are finding the torque (moment) it generates about the pivot point. Do you understand the definition of moment?

The moment is the turning force right ?
 
  • #10
ssj said:
The moment is the turning force right ?
You could call it that, yes.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Im stuck on the second question I posted because they haven't stated the length what do I do ?
 
  • #12
ssj said:
Im stuck on the second question I posted because they haven't stated the length what do I do ?
You are given all the lengths you need. (The force is at the midpoint of the beam.)
 
  • #13
So the length is the mid-point between 0 and 0.5 ? meaning its 0.25
 
  • #14
ssj said:
So the length is the mid-point between 0 and 0.5 ? meaning its 0.25
That's correct. But realize that you don't need the length of the beam: You can just use L or L/2. (The actual length doesn't matter.)
 
  • #15
But doesn't the formula state Motion=Force * perpendicular distance ? This would mean the formula is 200*L = L*T*sin30 correct ?
 
Last edited:
  • #16
ssj said:
But doesn't the formula state Motion=Force * perpendicular distance ? This would mean the formula is 200*L = L*T*sin30 correct ?
Sure. Notice that the length cancels from both sides of that equation.
 
  • #17
So your left with 200/sin30= T meaning 400= T ?
 
  • #18
ssj said:
So your left with 200/sin30= T meaning 400= T ?
Right, as I stated in post #4. (This is for your first problem.)
 
  • #19
This is for the second problem though, wouldn't the Motion be different due to the force being applyed to the mid-point? I seem to of gotten T=400 in my previous post.
 
  • #20
ssj said:
This is for the second problem though, wouldn't the Motion be different due to the force being applyed to the mid-point? I seem to of gotten T=400 in my previous post.
These calculations apply to the first problem.

For the second problem, the method is exactly the same: Set clockwise and counter-clockwise torques equal. Of course the torque exerted by the 200 N force is different in the second problem, since it's applied at the midpoint instead of at the end.
 
  • #21
Right, so I am correct when 200*L=L*T*Sin30 the "L"'s cancel out leaving 200=T*Sin30
We then Divide sin30 on each side leaving 200/sin30=T meaning 400=T is this correct ?
 
  • #22
ssj said:
Right, so I am correct when 200*L=L*T*Sin30 the "L"'s cancel out leaving 200=T*Sin30
We then Divide sin30 on each side leaving 200/sin30=T meaning 400=T is this correct ?
You are correct for the first problem, but not if you are talking about the second problem. (In the second problem, the moment arm for the 200 N force is no longer L.)
 
  • #23
What is it then in the second problem?
 
  • #24
ssj said:
What is it then in the second problem?
You tell me. That force is applied at the midpoint of the beam, so what do you think?
 
  • #25
I think that it becomes 200*0.25=0.25*t*sin30 is this equation correct ? 0.25 because 0.5/2= 0.25 also now the center of gravity has changed.
 
  • #26
ssj said:
I think that it becomes 200*0.25=0.25*t*sin30 is this equation correct ? 0.25 because 0.5/2= 0.25 also now the center of gravity has changed.
Not exactly. The only thing that changed is the point of application of the 200 N force; the other force (the tension) is still applied at the same place.
 
  • #27
Doc Al said:
Not exactly. The only thing that changed is the point of application of the 200 N force; the other force (the tension) is still applied at the same place.

Wouldnt this mean that the pivot is slightly more changing the angle as the force is closer to the motion.
 
  • #28
The pivot isn't changing, but the distance to the pivot point is. (At least for the 200 N force.)
 
  • #29
Alright so the perpendicular distance is changing its now at the mid point the half of 0.5 is 0.25 and due to the fact that the force has moved half way I assume the distance is now half as well thus making it 0.25.
 
  • #30
Right. If the beam has length L, then that 200 N force is a distance of L/2 from the pivot.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K