Calculate Work & Power of Liquid Water Turbine

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the specific work and power produced by a liquid water turbine, given specific inlet and outlet conditions, including mass flow rate, pressure, temperature, and velocity. The participants are examining the energy equation and the enthalpy values used in the calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of specific enthalpy values and question the accuracy of the original poster's calculations. There are inquiries about the appropriateness of using a program for enthalpy values versus standard tables. Some participants express confusion regarding the nature of the turbine and the assumptions about the fluid state at the exit.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's approach and calculations. There is a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the use of enthalpy values and the interpretation of the problem. Some participants have offered clarifications about the conditions of the fluid and the implications for the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of constraints related to the availability of enthalpy tables and the potential for interpolation errors. Participants are also considering the implications of using different states of the fluid (saturated vs. compressed) on the calculations.

JSBeckton
Messages
224
Reaction score
0
A liquid water turbine receives 2kg/s water at 2000kPa, 20C, and velocity of 15m/s. The exit is at 100kPa, 20C and very low velocity. Find specific work and power produced.

From my tables I get

hi=85.82 kJ/kg
he=84.03 kJ/kg

Energy equation reduces to:

<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> h_i + \frac{{V_i^2 }}{2} = \omega + h_e \\ <br /> \omega = h_i + \frac{{V_i^2 }}{2} - h_e \\ <br /> \omega = 85.82\frac{{kJ}}{{kg}} + \left( {\frac{{15m/s^2 }}{2} \times \frac{{1km}}{{1000m}}} \right) - 84.03\frac{{kJ}}{{kg}} \\ <br /> \omega = 1.9025\frac{{kJ}}{{kg}} \\ <br /> \end{array}<br />

But the anwser should be 1.99 kJ/kg
Can anyone tell me what I did wrong? Are my specific enthalpys right?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arg, please stop using omega for specific work, its lower case w, not omega! :cry:

[rant]
Man, another poorly written problem. Throw your textbook in trash!

A TURBINE MUST HAVE STEAM AT THE INLET!

What is this guys problem?

Does he also have pumps compressing vapor?...:rolleyes:
[/rant]
How did you find your enthalpy values? Your method looks good.
 
Last edited:
Maybe it uses the kinetic theory of gas for a steam input, not a liquid input.
 
No, it does not.
 
oh 15m/s, your right, for once.
 
Pengwuino said:
oh 15m/s, your right, for once.

What are you talking about? :confused:
 
Wait what are you talking about.
 
Sorry about the omega, I used the computer tables that came with my crappy book to find the enthalpys because its not inthe table and I'm too lazy to interpolate. I've used the program many times and it hasn't failed me yet. Do you get different values?
 
Is there not such a thing as a liquid turbine?
 
  • #10
A turbine runs on GAS/STEAM

A COMPRESSOR RUNS ON LIQUIDS

I don't know. Look it up yourself. Look it up for the saturated liquid at that TEMPERATURE.

Pengwuino, stop playing around in here. :mad:
 
  • #11
The difference in your anwser is because your using a program and not the enthalpy in your table. Its an error of the second decimal place. Use your TABLE! and see what happens. There is a reason why they publish those tables for you! :wink: ...mumbles lazy...
 
  • #12
The program is basically expanded tables. I do not have tables for 100kPa and 20C I have:

P=500 Kpa
h=84.41

and

P=2.339
h=83.94

I interpolate to find:

<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> \frac{{84.41 - 83.94}}{{500 - 2.339}} = \frac{{h - 83.94}}{{100 - 2.339}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> h = 84.03 \\ <br /> \end{array}<br />

Exactly what my computer tables told me, that's why i asked if you had tables that said differently. What is the problem?

Thanks for your help.
 
  • #13
100kPa and 20C

You sure do. Look at the table under pressure for 100kpa. What is the saturation temperature? Is it below 20C? If it is, your exit is a superheated steam. If it is above, then you have a saturated stream at the exit (or possibly only liquid at the exit).

P.S., you don't interpolate in 500kpa intervals. (That would be a bad idea)
 
  • #14
at 100 kPa, T=99.62C

It is a compressed liquid right? my compressed liquid tables start out at 500kPa, that's why I used that high value. I only have the saturated value and the lowest compressed value to work with, what else can i do?
 
  • #15
Ok, so you are below there, and therefore yes, you should have a compressed liquid. That means that the enthalpy is just the value of the enthalpy for a SATURATED LIQUID at 100KPa. Hf
 
  • #16
Cyrus, It's possible to have liquid turbines with a liquid at the inlet.

For example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_turbine" have water flowing in the inlet.

One more thing,
That means that the enthalpy is just the value of the enthalpy for a SATURATED LIQUID at 100KPa. Hf

Should it not be, The enthalpy is just the value of the enthalpy for a saturated liquid at 20 C, and not 100Kpa?

And JSBeckton, there isn't much of a difference between 1.90 and 1.99. Maybe, the difference is due to the tables.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #17
Well I'll be dammed. :smile:

I am used to thinking of turbines as Gas turbines. :frown:

Damn you and your infinite smartness Siddharth! :wink:

You little genius! :devil:

I still think the wording in many of his problems are careless though...

Edit: Yep, good catch sidd, at 20C.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Thanks guys, I used the value given at saturated 20C and got 1.99! My question still remains, in my compression tables the specific enthalpy increaces with pressure albeit not by a lot So was my anwser not more accurate than theirs, and hence would i have not lost points? I guess nearly 5% error seems somewhat significant to me.
 
  • #19
You should ask that to your prof or TA.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
4K