Calculating a Ballistic Coefficient (BC) from two velocities

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the Ballistic Coefficient (BC) using a specific formula that incorporates air density, distance, and two velocities. The initial calculation yielded a BC of 0.0329, which was significantly lower than vendor and online calculator values. A key issue identified was the misunderstanding of the air density constant and its proper application in the formula. After correcting the calculations using metric values and the appropriate air resistance constant, the revised BC was found to be 0.451. The importance of unit consistency and accurate conversion between imperial and metric systems was emphasized in achieving accurate results.
jr-c1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have been attempting to calculate a Ballistic Coefficient (BC) from two velocities of a known distance using the formula:

BC = (AirDensity * Distance) / ( SQRT(Velocity0) - SQRT(Velocity1))​

for example

AirDensity = 0.0751265 lb/ft³
Distance = 100 yards
Velocity0 = 3000 fps
Velocity1 = 2772 fps
BC = 0.0329​

In this example, I have compared this result with the vendor's published BC (.415) and two online BC calculators (.455 and .422) and I'm considerable off.

As I understand it, air density needs to be factored in.

Can someone help with the correct formula?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I see my first problem was thinking the 0.0052834 constant had to be converted to use either the ICAO or Metro standard atmosphere used by the manufacturers, which led me to use Air Density and Air Resistance constants interchangeably. Thanks for straightening this out for me.

After going back and revisiting the calculations using metric values and appropriate speed at 100 meters vs 100 yards:

Air Resistance = 0.0052834
Distance = 100 meters
Velocity0 = 914.4 mps (3000 fps)
Velocity100 = 838 mps @ 100 meters (vs 2772 fps at 100 yards)
BC = .451

@jrmichler, your the BEST!
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
23K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
48K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K