Calculating a value that depends on itself.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tomyuey938
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of an object that stretches over time, where the velocity decreases as the length increases. Participants explore the relationship between velocity and length through mathematical expressions and integrals, seeking methods to solve the equations involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the velocity at time (t) can be expressed as v(t) = A / (B L(t)), where L(t) is the length at time t.
  • Another participant suggests that the change in distance over a small time dt can be expressed as dL = v(t) dt, and questions if dL/dt = A/BL is the correct interpretation.
  • A participant clarifies that they need to find v(t) but do not know L, which is defined as the integral of v(t) dt up to time t.
  • One participant mentions a self-consistent approach to solving the equation and derives L = sqrt(2At/B) through integration.
  • Another participant differentiates the derived expression to find dL/dt and raises a concern that this suggests infinite speed as t approaches 0.
  • A later reply points out that a constant of integration is missing in the previous approach and discusses the implications of assuming zero length at t=0, which could lead to infinite velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct approach to solving the equations, with some supporting the self-consistent method while others highlight potential oversights, such as the need for a constant of integration. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of the derived equations, particularly at t=0.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding assumptions about initial conditions, such as the length at t=0, and the dependence on definitions of velocity and length. The discussion does not resolve these aspects.

tomyuey938
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm calculating the velocity of something that's stretching, and as it gets longer, the velocity decreases.
So to calculate the velocity at time (t):
v(t) = A / (B L(t))

A change in the distance over a small time dt will be given by:
dL=v(t) dt

So I guess the distance is:
L= integral from 0 to t of v(t) dt ?

How can I go about solving such an equation? Are itterative methods required? Can anyone give me some keywords to help my search on google? I don't really know where to start.

Thanks a lot for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi tomyuey938! :wink:
tomyuey938 said:
Hi,
I'm calculating the velocity of something that's stretching, and as it gets longer, the velocity decreases.
So to calculate the velocity at time (t):
v(t) = A / (B L(t))

A change in the distance over a small time dt will be given by:
dL=v(t) dt

i'm confused :confused:

do you mean dL/dt = A/BL ?

if so just move the terms around: L dL = A dt/B :smile:
 
Hi tiny-tim,

Thanks for your reply.

Well, I'm trying to calculate the value of v(t) at a given value of (t). So I don't think your re-arrangement is relevant in this case, since I need v(t)=something.
But I don't know the value of L, since L is the integral of v(t) dt up to that time (t).

Does that make sense? Please do let me know if you'd like me to explain anything more, or if you think I'm mis-understanding something (which is quite possible!).

Thanks and with regards.
 
Hi tomyuey. tiny-tim's approach is indeed correct (although if you're curious the practice of solving an equation which is dependent on itself uses what's called a SELF-CONSISTENT approach). However, for this case \frac{dL}{dt}=v so we can plug that into get

v=\frac{dL}{dt} = \frac{A}{B L} \rightarrow L dL = \frac{A}{B}dt

Integrating one gets

\frac{L^2}{2}=\frac{At}{B}\rightarrow L=\sqrt{\frac{2At}{B}}
 
Hi Starstrider,

Thanks for your reply.

So in order to get an expression for v(t), I simply differentiate both sides by t to give:

dL/dt = SQRT(2A/B) (1/2) t^(-1/2)

Thanks also for the "self-consistent" term. This will be helpful in the future.

Thank you both so much for your help. I really do appreciate it.

Edit: but this suggests as t->0 the speed becomes infinite. Is this really correct, or have I made a mistake?
 
Last edited:
L equals what you said not dL/dt
 
maverick_starstrider's approach is missing a constant of integration. It should be:

\frac{L^2}{2}=\frac{At}{B}+C \Rightarrow L = \sqrt{\frac{2At}{B} + 2C}

Where 2C is the square of the length at t=0. Now, if the object has zero length at t=0 (as MS implicitly assumes), then since the velocity is inversely proportional to the length, one would indeed expect the velocity to be infinite at t=0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K