I Conservation of Mass for Compressible Flow

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of the conservation of mass in compressible flow, focusing on a setup involving a piston pushing air through a pipe. The user seeks to derive the density function, ρ(u,t), from the conservation equations, but encounters challenges due to the complexity of the variables involved. Participants emphasize that to solve for the flow velocity and density, additional equations, such as those relating to momentum and pressure, are necessary. The conversation also touches on the mathematical foundations of the continuity equation and the importance of proper limits and Taylor expansions in deriving these relationships. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the interconnectedness of mass conservation and fluid dynamics principles in solving the problem.
  • #31
wrobel said:
Let ##\omega## be a k-form on m-dimensional manifold ##M,\quad m\ge k.## Let ## v## be a vector field on ##M## and ##g^t## be its flow.

Let ##S\subset M## be a k-dimensional compact submanifold. Then
$$\frac{d}{dt}\Big|_{t=0}\int_{g^t(S)}\omega=\int_SL_v\omega.$$ Here ##L_v## is a Lie derivative and the formula follows directly from the change of variables.

Particularly if k=m then ##\omega=\rho(x)dx^1\wedge\ldots\wedge dx^m## and
$$L_v\omega=\frac{\partial (\rho v^i)}{\partial x^i} dx^1\wedge\ldots\wedge dx^m.$$

From the group property it is not hard to show that the following conditions are equivalent

1) ##\frac{d}{dt}\Big|_{t=0}\int_{g^t(S)}\omega=0## for any k-dimensional compact submanifold S;
2) ##\frac{d}{dt}\int_{g^t(S)}\omega=0,\quad \forall t## and for any k-dimensional compact submanifold S;
3) ##L_v\omega=0##

This method is covering a lot of different circulations theorems in electrodynamics and hydro dynamics as well
In the fluid-mechanics literature those are known also as "Reynolds transport theorems". This is the modern Cartan-calculus formulation of them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Yes! Elie Cartan's integral invariants.

Df. A form ##\omega## is called relative integral invariant iff ##L_v\omega=d\Omega\quad (\exists \Omega)##.
A form ##\alpha## is called absolute integral invariant iff ##L_v\alpha=0##.

If ##\omega## is a relative integral invariant then ##d\omega## is an absolute integral invariant: ##L_vd\omega=dL_v\omega=dd\Omega##
and
$$\frac{d}{dt}\Big|_{t=0}\int_{g^t(S)}\omega=\int_SL_v\omega=\int_{\partial S}\Omega.$$

For further play with these formulas use
$$L_v\omega=i_vd\omega+di_v\omega;$$

De Rham's theorem is also near here
etc.

For example in the extended phase space of a Hamiltonian system one has: ##dp_i\wedge dx^i-dH\wedge dt## is an absolute integral invariant; ##p_idx^i-Hdt## is a relative integral invariant.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and vanhees71
  • #33
vanhees71 said:
In the fluid-mechanics literature those are known also as "Reynolds transport theorems". This is the modern Cartan-calculus formulation of them.
The funny thing is, I know about Reynolds Transport Theorems, but I never would have recognized that(and frankly still can’t)! @wrobel said “k form on m dimensional manifold” and my head exploded. 🤯
 
  • #34
The advantage of the modern Cartan calculus is that it becomes in a way very natural, and it's very general too, because it works not only in (pseudo)-Riemannian manifolds but in general differentiable manifolds, i.e., the Lie derivative and Stokes's theorem for alternating (differential) forms are independent of any additional structures like connections and/or (pseudo-)metrics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
594
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K