Calculating Air Flow Through a Hole

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on calculating air flow through a hole in a container under vacuum conditions. Participants explore various theoretical approaches and equations relevant to fluid dynamics, particularly in the context of orifice flow and compressible flow scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a formula for air flow through a hole given a specific vacuum and hole size.
  • Another participant discusses the conservation of energy in relation to pressure differences and kinetic energy, proposing a relationship involving the outside pressure and the density of air.
  • Some participants suggest that orifice flow calculations may be applicable, referencing external resources for further information.
  • There is a contention regarding the applicability of Bernoulli's equation, with some arguing it does not account for choked flow and the geometry of the orifice, while others suggest it could be a useful first approximation.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of considering compressibility effects and the conditions under which choked flow occurs, particularly in a vacuum scenario.
  • Another participant introduces a more complex relationship involving Mach numbers and pressure ratios, indicating that classical Bernoulli's equation may only be valid under certain conditions.
  • There is a discussion about the meaning of terms in mathematical expansions, indicating a shared interest in the technical details of the equations presented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of Bernoulli's equation and the conditions affecting air flow through the hole. There is no consensus on a single approach or formula, and multiple competing models and perspectives remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the assumptions of incompressibility and the effects of pressure differentials on flow characteristics. The discussion also touches on the need for a discharge coefficient in orifice calculations, which remains unresolved.

solar1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to find a formula for calculating air flow through a hole. If I have a container with a known volume and a pump that can maintain a specific vacuum in the container, is there a way to calculate the amount air that would flow through a leak of a known size?

Thanks
Solar1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
solar1 said:
Hello,

I am trying to find a formula for calculating air flow through a hole. If I have a container with a known volume and a pump that can maintain a specific vacuum in the container, is there a way to calculate the amount air that would flow through a leak of a known size?
Yes.

Pressure is a measure of the energy density of the gas. The energy density of the gas on the outside is the outside pressure. Since energy is conserved in the process of the gas entering the vacuum (lower pressure) through the hole, it must gain kinetic energy ie. speed up.

The energy per unit volume of the gas flowing through the hole is P_{outside} = \frac{1}{2}\rho v^2 + P_{inside}.

where \rho is the mass/unit volume of the air as it is passing through the hole, which is the same as the density of the air on the outside.

AM
 
Last edited:
Hi Andrew. I respectfully disagree with you. Bernoulli's is incorrect here. It does not provide any way of calculating the flow rate given the geometry of an orifice (ie: discharge coefficient). It also does not take into account choked versus unchoked flow and sonic conditions being present. In the case of a vacuum vessel leaking from atmosphere, you will have choked flow and a sonic shock at the orifice vena contracta. Bernoulli's is only an energy conservation equation.
 
Q_Goest said:
Hi Andrew. I respectfully disagree with you. Bernoulli's is incorrect here. It does not provide any way of calculating the flow rate given the geometry of an orifice (ie: discharge coefficient). It also does not take into account choked versus unchoked flow and sonic conditions being present. In the case of a vacuum vessel leaking from atmosphere, you will have choked flow and a sonic shock at the orifice vena contracta. Bernoulli's is only an energy conservation equation.
Well you could use Bernoulli's equation for compressible flow, but I don't see why there would be compression of air before the air passes through the hole. Expansion of the air after it enters the vacuum is irrelevant to the flow through the hole. The pump keeps the vacuum pressure constant.

All you need to do is analyse a slice of air of area A and thickness ds that is pushed through the opening. The work done on that slice by the pressure difference is W = \Delta PdV = (P_{outside}-0)Ads. Since this energy must increase the kinetic energy of the air slice, PAds = \frac{1}{2}dmv^2 = \frac{1}{2}\rho Adsv^2. This simplifies to P = \frac{1}{2}\rho v^2

AM
 
One of the three stipulations to the derivation of Bernoulli is incompressible flow. Q is absolutely correct in that in this case it is very easy to have choked flow. Also, by that time compressibility effects are there as well. You could have a pressure factor of 2 across that orifice and not quite be choked flow, but the density is definitely going to be effected, which effects your mass flow rate (it should be noted that since it appears that a vacuum is on the outlet of the orifice, mass flow will choke as well). However, since it is so easy, I'd take a stab at it using Bernoulli as a first pass just to see if it's in the ball park. It wouldn't hurt. Perhaps the OP is keeping the delta P very small across the orifice and it may be applicable. We don't really know right now.

As much as I hate to advertise for M.B., his url referenced by Q is probably the best way to go. It covers all the bases. It does have the one sticking point which is estimating a discharge coefficient for the orifice.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Fred.
 
No thanks needed, but you're welcome. You jarred my memory on this type of set up. I haven't had to deal with this in quite a while (getting rusty).
 
  • #10
Andrew Mason said:
Well you could use Bernoulli's equation for compressible flow

Sure, you will find that the ratio of pressures is proportional somehow to the local mach number, assuming that the flow is isentropic:


\frac{P_o}{P}=\left(1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)^{\gamma/(\gamma-1)}

If M=\frac{U}{a}=\sqrt{\frac{1}{\gamma}\frac{\rho U^2}{P}}<<1 then the flow can be regarded as approximately incompressible at first order in M^2:

\frac{P_o}{P}=1+\frac{1}{2}\gamma M^2+\frac{1}{8}\gamma M^4+O(M^6)=1+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\rho U^2}{P}+\frac{1}{8}\frac{\rho^2 U^4}{\gamma P^2}+O(M^6)

Notice that the first two terms in this Mach number asymptotic expansion are just the classical Bernoulli equation for incompressible flow. Now, M^2\sim \rho U^2/P\sim \Delta P/P. Thus the classical Bernoulli equation is only valid if \Delta P/P<<1.

Therefore Qgoest and Fred Garvin are right. In this example, particularly dealing with vacuum, one may expect a great variation of pressure across the hole.
 
  • #11
Hey Clausius! Long time no see. Hope things are going well out west.

Out of curiosity, what is O in the above equation? It's not ringing any bells.
 
  • #12
FredGarvin said:
Hey Clausius! Long time no see. Hope things are going well out west.

Out of curiosity, what is O in the above equation? It's not ringing any bells.

Hey man,

It's an O of Okey Cool. :smile:

Now seriously, that symbol is called a big "O of Landau". Indicates that the next term iin the expansion is as large as x (of order x): O(x).
 
  • #13
Ahhhh. I see. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
21K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K