Calculating Airplane Lift Energy Requirements

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter japam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airplane Energy Lift
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the energy requirements for an airplane to achieve lift, focusing on potential energy, power calculations, and the dynamics of different flight scenarios. Participants explore various factors affecting lift, including drag, climb rate, and energy consumption during different flight modes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes calculating the potential energy required to lift an airplane to a height of 2000 meters, estimating a power requirement of around 1 megawatt.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of considering work done on the air during hovering, noting that significant energy is consumed even without work done on the jet itself.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the original calculation may be misinterpreted, arguing that the focus should be on the power required for forward motion rather than vertical lift, particularly for conventionally powered airplanes.
  • One participant mentions the need to account for drag and climb rate to accurately determine the required power for lift.
  • Another contribution highlights the energy content of fuel as a critical factor, suggesting a method to estimate energy usage based on fuel mass flow and mechanical losses.
  • A participant provides a calculation based on maintaining altitude, estimating the energy required to lift a mass of 40 tons to a height of 5 meters, resulting in a power estimate of approximately 2 megawatts.
  • It is noted that for horizontal flight, power consumed is related to aerodynamic drag force multiplied by speed, with additional considerations for non-horizontal flight scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculations and assumptions involved in determining energy requirements for lift, with no consensus reached on the correct approach or figures.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying assumptions about flight scenarios (hovering vs. forward motion), dependence on specific aircraft characteristics (mass, drag, climb rate), and unresolved mathematical steps in the calculations presented.

japam
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Im trying to calculate energy of the turbines to lift an airplane , by this way, calculating potential energy necessary to lift mass of the plane to an height of, let's say, 2000 meters , ,supose it spend 1 minute in reach this altitude, it gives me a result of the order of 1 megawatts of power , is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'd have to base this on a jet that climbs while hovering, like a Harrier. The time it takes doesn't matter. Work done on the jet is the force times the distance the jet is moved.

Work done on the air is a different matter though. Even in a steady hover, a huge amount of work is done on the air, accelerating it downwards and increasing the total energy of the air, and a huge amount of energy is consumed while hovering, even though there is no work done on the jet itself.
 
In any case, a megawatt could be a reasonable figure for a real airplane. But you didn't give us much information...
 
Jeff Reid said:
You'd have to base this on a jet that climbs while hovering, like a Harrier. The time it takes doesn't matter. Work done on the jet is the force times the distance the jet is moved.

Work done on the air is a different matter though. Even in a steady hover, a huge amount of work is done on the air, accelerating it downwards and increasing the total energy of the air, and a huge amount of energy is consumed while hovering, even though there is no work done on the jet itself.

I disagree...well sort of. I believe he is trying to calculate the power required to move a jet forward, not strait up like a harrier. If he was referring to a VTOL then you would be correct. I however will assume that he is talking about a conventionally powered airplane.

In order to even remotely accurately find this required power you need to know the amount of drag on the aircraft and its climb rate and assume the coefficient of lift is enough to reach this climb rate. If you want to know the power for take off you will require the mass of the craft as well.
 
I would say that if you are interested in energy, you take the energy content of the fuel, which for JET-A is about 18505 BTU/Lbm and measure the fuel mass flow, exhaust temp and inlet temp to get a rough idea of how much energy is being used by the engine and what is being spent out the exhaust duct. You would have to make a swag at the mechanical losses.
 
my preliminary calculation was, suposing the plane was already in the air, and a watt= 1 joule per second,then you calculate how much falls a mass in 1 second , its aprox 5 m,hence the energy to maintain plane is equal to potential energy to lift to 5 meters, ; supposing the mass of the plane be 40 tons, then take E= m*g*h= 40000k*g*5m = aprox 2 Megajoules /sec = 2 Mwatts
 
If the reference was regarding horizontal flight, then power consumed equals aerodynamic drag force times speed. If flight isn't horizontal, then add weight of the aircraft times sin of angle from horizontal to aerodynamic drag force, and still multiply by speed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K