Calculating Angular Momentum: Converting Units and Solving for Mass and Velocity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating angular momentum, specifically focusing on unit conversion and the implications of direction in the context of a train's movement. Participants are examining the calculations related to mass and velocity, particularly in the context of a train's angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of angular momentum using specific values for mass and velocity, questioning the accuracy of rounding and the assumptions made about directionality in the problem setup.

Discussion Status

There is a productive exchange regarding the correctness of the calculated angular momentum value and the potential impact of rounding on grading. Participants are also exploring the ambiguity in the problem's description regarding the direction of the train's movement and its implications for the interpretation of the results.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not explicitly state the direction of the train's movement, leading to different interpretations of the scenario. This ambiguity may affect the understanding of the angular momentum vector's direction.

Sneakatone
Messages
318
Reaction score
0
I used kg*m/s*m

so 1500 metric tons=1500000 kg
85 km/h=23.61 m/s

( 1500000 )*23.61*53=1.877x10^9 kg*m^2/s

I feel like this is correct.
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2013-04-16 at 6.19.21 PM.png
    Screen shot 2013-04-16 at 6.19.21 PM.png
    34.5 KB · Views: 581
Physics news on Phys.org
1.877 x 10^9 kg*m^2/s looks right. Perhaps there's an issue with your rounding of the answer.
 
I agree with you. Maybe because you rounded down, they didn't give the mark? The one other thing that it might be, is that they don't actually say which direction the train is moving in. They just say where the point is in relation to the track. The natural assumption is to do as you did, and assume they mean that if the point is 'to the left' of the train, then that means someone who is facing forward on the train will see the point on their left. But there is an ambiguity here. Maybe they took it to be the other way around.
 
I origionally put 1.8 instead of 1.877 but your right, thanks!
 
BruceW said:
I agree with you. Maybe because you rounded down, they didn't give the mark? The one other thing that it might be, is that they don't actually say which direction the train is moving in. They just say where the point is in relation to the track. The natural assumption is to do as you did, and assume they mean that if the point is 'to the left' of the train, then that means someone who is facing forward on the train will see the point on their left. But there is an ambiguity here. Maybe they took it to be the other way around.

The direction "upwards" for the angular momentum vector was marked correct, so it looks like the assumption panned out.
 
oh yeah. good, good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K