Calculating Cable Car's Speed on Hill Descent - 4122N Braking Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluebear19
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brakes Cable Car
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a cable car descending a hill, where participants explore the forces acting on the system, including gravitational potential energy and braking forces. The subject area includes concepts from mechanics, specifically forces, energy conservation, and kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy to relate gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. There are attempts to calculate the braking force and the speed of the cable car at the bottom of the hill. Questions arise regarding the definitions of potential and kinetic energy, as well as the implications of the counterweight's effect on the system.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the conservation of energy approach and the need to consider both the cable car and counterweight. There is ongoing exploration of different methods to solve the problem, with various interpretations of the forces and kinematics involved. While some calculations have been attempted, there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or final answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants express concern about submitting incorrect answers, highlighting the pressure of homework deadlines. There are discussions about the relevance of angles in the calculations and the total mass of the system, indicating potential confusion about the problem setup.

bluebear19
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The 2100kg cable car shown in the figure descends a 200-m-high hill. In addition to its brakes, the cable car controls its speed by pulling an 1840kg counterweight up the other side of the hill. The rolling friction of both the cable car and the counterweight are negligible.

How much braking force does the cable car need to descend at constant speed?

One day the brakes fail just as the cable car leaves the top on its downward journey. What is the runaway car's speed at the bottom of the hill?

Homework Equations



F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I already found the breaking force = 4122N
but my answers for the second question was always wrong
 

Attachments

  • knight_Figure_08_39[1].jpg
    knight_Figure_08_39[1].jpg
    6.3 KB · Views: 664
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Use conservation of energy.

U_g = mg\Delta h

E_k = \frac{1}{2}mv^2
 
Last edited:


So Ug = 4122*200 = 824600?
what does Ug or Ek stand for?

I'm really worried because I have to submit my answer online and if I get it wrong, its not like I can change it. thanks so much for helping!
 


bluebear19 said:
So Ug = 4122*200 = 824600?
No.
what does Ug or Ek stand for?
Gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy.

When considering conservation of energy, be sure to consider both the car and the counterweight.
 


so does Ek = 824600 = .5mv^2
then 824600 = .5(4123/9.8)v^2
and v = 62.6m/s?
i don't know if I'm doing this right at all
 


There are at least two (equivalent) ways to attack this problem. You can use the result from part one to find the net force on the system and then its acceleration. Then you can find the final speed using kinematics.

Or you can use conservation of energy: ΔKE + ΔPE = 0. Start by finding the change in PE of the system. Hint: The car goes down while the counterweight goes up.
 


so if i use the first way and my results from the first part which the net force = 4120N. That's the right answer

then I do F = ma
4120 = (2100sin30 - 1840sin20)a
a = 9.8m/s^2
isnt that the same as g?

so if that's right then I use : V_s^2 = V_0^2 + 2a(delta x)
delta x: sin30 = 200/x
x = 400m
V_s^2 = 0 + 2(9.8)(400)
v = 88.5m/s

i did this and the answer was wrong, can you please tell me what I did wrong, thanks so you much!
 


bluebear19 said:
so if i use the first way and my results from the first part which the net force = 4120N. That's the right answer
OK. If the breaking force is removed, then 4120 N is the net force.

then I do F = ma
4120 = (2100sin30 - 1840sin20)a
m is the mass of the system. Just add the masses.
a = 9.8m/s^2
isnt that the same as g?
Getting a = g should tip you off that something's wrong. :wink:
 


so I don't have to take into account the angles of the slopes at all?

so then 4120 = (2100+?? or - 1840) because isn't the counterweight slowing the car down? so should I add the masses

and then do I use the same kinematics that I used before??
 
  • #10


bluebear19 said:
so I don't have to take into account the angles of the slopes at all?
Not when calculating the total mass.

so then 4120 = (2100+?? or - 1840) because isn't the counterweight slowing the car down? so should I add the masses
The total mass is just the sum of both masses. Just add them.

and then do I use the same kinematics that I used before??
Yes.
 
  • #11


4120 = (2100 + 1840)a
a = 1.04 m/s^2

V_f^2 = 0 + 2(1.04)(400)
V_f = 28.9m/s

so the 400 m is right?
and would the final velocity be negative since its going downhill?
 
  • #12


nevermind I got it thank you sooooo much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
25K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K