Why Does Calculating the Speed of a Runaway Cable Car Involve Both Masses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mullets1200
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a runaway cable car, weighing 1990 kg, descending a 200-meter hill while pulling a 1780 kg counterweight. The correct braking force required for the cable car to descend at a constant speed is determined to be 3780 N. However, the initial attempt to calculate the runaway speed at the bottom of the hill yielded an incorrect result of 35 m/s. The error was identified as neglecting the kinetic energy increase of both the cable car and the counterweight in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic principles of energy conservation
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions in physics
  • Familiarity with gravitational force calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Learn about the effects of mass and acceleration on kinetic energy
  • Study the application of trigonometry in physics problems
  • Explore advanced dynamics involving multiple bodies and forces
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding dynamics and energy conservation in mechanical systems.

mullets1200
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The 1990 kg cable car shown in the figure descends a 200-m-high hill. In addition to its brakes, the cable car controls its speed by pulling an 1780 kg counterweight up the other side of the hill. The rolling friction of both the cable car and the counterweight are negligible.

The trangle that this is on is a 30-20-130 triangle. The counter weight is on the 20 degree side while the cable car is on the 30 degree side

1) How much braking force does the cable car need to descend at constant speed?
3780 N

2) One day the brakes fail just as the cable car leaves the top on its downward journey. What is the runaway car's speed at the bottom of the hill?



The Attempt at a Solution


for part 1 i did:
1990*g*sin(30)-1780*g*sin(20)
3780N which was correct

for part 2 i did:
The height dropped on the AB side is 200m
The height gained on the BC side is
200/L=sin(30)
L=200/sin(30)
hbc*sin(30)/200=sin(20)
hbc=200*sin(20)/sin(30)
137 m

m*g*(200-137)=.5*m*v^2
v=sqrt(2*g*63)
35 m/s but it was wrong.

any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mullets1200 said:
m*g*(200-137)=.5*m*v^2

any help?

The cable car and the counter weigth have a different mass, so m*g*(200-137) is
wrong.
You also need to account for the increase in kinect energy of both the car and
the counterweight.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
25K
Replies
11
Views
15K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K