Why Does Calculating the Speed of a Runaway Cable Car Involve Both Masses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mullets1200
  • Start date Start date
mullets1200
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The 1990 kg cable car shown in the figure descends a 200-m-high hill. In addition to its brakes, the cable car controls its speed by pulling an 1780 kg counterweight up the other side of the hill. The rolling friction of both the cable car and the counterweight are negligible.

The trangle that this is on is a 30-20-130 triangle. The counter weight is on the 20 degree side while the cable car is on the 30 degree side

1) How much braking force does the cable car need to descend at constant speed?
3780 N

2) One day the brakes fail just as the cable car leaves the top on its downward journey. What is the runaway car's speed at the bottom of the hill?



The Attempt at a Solution


for part 1 i did:
1990*g*sin(30)-1780*g*sin(20)
3780N which was correct

for part 2 i did:
The height dropped on the AB side is 200m
The height gained on the BC side is
200/L=sin(30)
L=200/sin(30)
hbc*sin(30)/200=sin(20)
hbc=200*sin(20)/sin(30)
137 m

m*g*(200-137)=.5*m*v^2
v=sqrt(2*g*63)
35 m/s but it was wrong.

any help?
 
on Phys.org
mullets1200 said:
m*g*(200-137)=.5*m*v^2

any help?

The cable car and the counter weigth have a different mass, so m*g*(200-137) is
wrong.
You also need to account for the increase in kinect energy of both the car and
the counterweight.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
25K
Replies
11
Views
15K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K