Calculating Cliff Height Using Freefall Data

  • Thread starter Thread starter Billy_Bob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Freefall
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving free fall, specifically calculating the height of a cliff based on the time it takes for a boulder to fall a certain distance. The original poster presents a scenario where a hiker observes a boulder falling and notes the time taken for the last third of the fall.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply kinematic equations to find the height of the cliff but questions the reasoning behind the provided solution, particularly regarding the time intervals involved in the fall.
  • Some participants question the assumptions made about the time taken to fall different segments of the cliff and clarify the definitions of variables used in the equations.
  • There is a discussion about the interpretation of the time intervals and how they relate to the distances fallen.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem setup. Some have provided clarifications regarding the definitions of time intervals, and there is an acknowledgment of misunderstandings that have been addressed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that air resistance can be ignored, and there is a focus on the correct interpretation of the time intervals related to the distances fallen.

Billy_Bob
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This isn't really homework, but I'll be taking intro Physics in fall and am trying to get a grasp on the material ahead of time so I can do well.

Homework Statement



An alert hiker sees a boulder fall from the top of a distant cliff and notes that it takes 1.3s for the boulder to fall to the last third of the way to the ground. You may ignore air resistance.

A. What is the heigh of the claff in meters?

Homework Equations



What is wrong with how I did it described below, and why does the answer in the solution book say (2/3)h=(1/2)(g)(T - DeltaT)^2 with h being total height of the cliff, DeltaT being 1.3s, and T being the total time to hit the ground? Shouldn't it be (2/3)h=(1/2)(g)(DeltaT)^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought: Amount fallen = (2/3)(Total height) = (1/2)(g)(t)^2
(Total height) = (3/2)(1/2)(g)(t)^2 = (3/2)(1/2)(9.8)(1.3)^2 = 12.4m

The solution they provide is the attached image.
 

Attachments

  • 2.98-Solution.jpg
    2.98-Solution.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 1,992
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not thinking about this quite right. Setting it up as you've shown, you've assumed that the time it takes for the boulder to fall 2h/3 is the same as the time it takes to fall h/3.

We know that,

h = g(t^2)/2, where h represents the total height and t represents the total time. Since, it takes some known time, delta(t) to fall the last third (h/3), we know that the time it took to fall the first 2/3 of the distance was t - delta(t).

Therefore, 2h/3 = g(t - delta(t))^2/2.
 
"You're not thinking about this quite right. Setting it up as you've shown, you've assumed that the time it takes for the boulder to fall 2h/3 is the same as the time it takes to fall h/3."

Why have I assumed that? "(1/2)(g)(t)^2" is a unit of distance. Didn't I just find the distance to 2/3 of the way down the cliff and multiply that by 3/2 to find the distance the whole way down the cliff?

I understand they way you explain that last equation, but that's not how they explain it. Everything is the same except they define DeltaT to be the time it takes to fall from the top of the cliff to 2/3 of the way down, which is 1.3s. You define it to be the time to fall from 2/3 of the way down to the bottom.
 
No, that is not what you have done at all. The 1.3 s represents the time the object takes to fall the last third of the way down, after it has already been accelerating for a distance of 2h/3. Hence, you did not "just find the distance to 2/3 of the way down the cliff..." but rather the distance the boulder would fall if it fell from rest for 1.3 s.

Also, I defined delta(t) = 1.3 s exactly as you stated in your initial question, especially since the hiker notes that the it took 1.3 s for the boulder to fall the last third of the height. Since your attachment is still pending approval I cannot see how they have done it.
 
^Ahh, I was misunerstanding the problem. I thought it was saying 1.3 sec was the time to fall from the top of the cliff to the top of the bottom third of the cliff (hence going 2/3 of the way down).

Thanks
 
No problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K