Calculating Coefficient of Static Friction with Rock & Climber

  • Thread starter Thread starter FilthyOtis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rock Roll
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a climber of mass 72 kg standing on a rock sloping at 40 degrees to the horizontal, with a focus on determining the coefficient of static friction between the climber's boots and the rock.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the climber not sliding down the slope and the relationship between friction force and the net force. There are attempts to break down the gravitational force into components relative to the slope.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the forces involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the decomposition of forces and the application of Newton's First Law, but no consensus has been reached on the calculations or the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the application of angles and the geometry of the force diagrams. There is mention of homework constraints that require showing calculations, which adds to the complexity of the discussion.

FilthyOtis
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A climber of mass 72 kg can stand on a rock sloping at 40degrees to the horizontal. What can you deduce about the coefficient of static friction between his boots and the rock?

________________________________________________________

I'm really lost on this one. His weight = mg so 72*9.8 = 705.6 N

and that's about as far as I get. Anyone able to help make sense of what my next steps are and why? Thank you


- Otis
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the man is not sliding down the hill, what does this tell you about the net force in the direction of the slope? What does this then tell you about the value of the friction force?
 
G01 said:
If the man is not sliding down the hill, what does this tell you about the net force in the direction of the slope? What does this then tell you about the value of the friction force?


Well, the friction force would equal the applied force because he's not moving anywhere. I'm not sure what it says about the net force. I'm supposed to show some sort of calculations with my answer as well, but not sure what all I'm able to calculate.
 
You'll want to start by splitting the vertical force mg into components normal to the slope and parallel to the slope.
 
Remember that there will be a component of gravity acting along the slope.

Now the only two forces acting in the direction we care about, here the direction of the slope, are friction and the component of gravity. So, the total force in that direction is:

[tex]\Sigma F_{along \ slope} = F_{gravity} + F_{friction}[/tex]

Now, since the guy is not accelerating at all, what does Newton's First Law say the total force has to be equal to? Once you know this, you should be able to solve for the friction force and then the coefficient.
 
G01 said:
Remember that there will be a component of gravity acting along the slope.

Now the only two forces acting in the direction we care about, here the direction of the slope, are friction and the component of gravity. So, the total force in that direction is:

[tex]\Sigma F_{along \ slope} = F_{gravity} + F_{friction}[/tex]

Now, since the guy is not accelerating at all, what does Newton's First Law say the total force has to be equal to? Once you know this, you should be able to solve for the friction force and then the coefficient.


An object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.

He's at rest, so the total force must be equal to the friction force?

I want to say the force is 0 but isn't there always some force?

Dick says to split the vertical force mg into components normal to the slope and parallel to the slope.

Can I go sin = o / h

sin40 = 705.6 N / h

h = 705.6 N / sin40 = 1097.7 N

is that the force on the slope? what am I supposed to do with it?

I was just starting to get this stuff without the angles and now the angle has me totally lost. :\
 
You are making an error I've seen before. There are separate similar triangles for the force diagram and the slope diagram. The hypotenuse of one is not the hypotenuse of the other. The hypotenuse of the force diagram is mg. So the force parallel to the slope is mg*sin(theta). Not mg/sin(theta). Try and straighten this out on your own for now. Because I've got to go.
 
Dick said:
You are making an error I've seen before. There are separate similar triangles for the force diagram and the slope diagram. The hypotenuse of one is not the hypotenuse of the other. The hypotenuse of the force diagram is mg. So the force parallel to the slope is mg*sin(theta). Not mg/sin(theta). Try and straighten this out on your own for now. Because I've got to go.

If you have a slope of 40degrees to the horizontal and a vertical line coming straight down forming a triangle.. how can that vertical line possible be the hypotenuse? there's going to be a 90degree angle where the hypotenuse and horizontal meet up and hypotenuse will be opposite that angle.

I wish I could draw a triangle in here but I've no idea how. I will attempt to explain what I'm seeing when I read what you said.

take a 1, 2, sqrt3 triangle

the angle opposite the 1 is 60

the angle opposite the sqrt3 is 30

the angle opposite the 2 is 90

So sin(theta) = opposite / hypotenuse

sin60 = 1 / 2

when I read what you said it appears to me that the 1 is the hypotenuse. So I'm obviously totally missing something here. I can't see where any other triangles are formed that I have info for or can use.
 
FilthyOtis said:
If you have a slope of 40degrees to the horizontal and a vertical line coming straight down forming a triangle.. how can that vertical line possible be the hypotenuse? there's going to be a 90degree angle where the hypotenuse and horizontal meet up and hypotenuse will be opposite that angle.
Whenever you use a right triangle to find the components of a vector, the full vector is always the hypotenuse. In this case you are trying to find the components of the weight, which is represented by a vertical line: so that vertical line is the hypotenuse of your right triangle. Since you want components parallel and perpendicular to the slope, the other sides of your triangle must be parallel and perpendicular to the slope.

This attached diagram might help you visualize the components and how they might form a triangle.
 

Attachments

  • #10
Try looking at some diagrams here:

http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/Phys/Class/vectors/u3l3e.html

Notice that the largest force is the vertical force mg, and the other component forces form the legs of a triangle with it. Not the same triangle as the slope triangle but one similar to it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Dick said:
Try looking at some diagrams here:

http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/Phys/Class/vectors/u3l3e.html

Notice that the largest force is the vertical force mg, and the other component forces form the legs of a triangle with it. Not the same triangle as the slope triangle but one similar to it.


Thanks for that link, it helped a lot. Starting to make sense now. I feel pretty confident I can get it now and with a little more practice have it down for tests.

- Otis
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
10K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
20K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K