Calculating Complex Logarithms

Click For Summary
The calculation of the complex logarithm ##\log (e^{1+2i})## is verified using the definition ##\log z = \ln |z| + i \arg z##. The steps show that ##\log (e^{1+2i}) = 1 + i \arg(e e^{2i})##, where ##e^{2i}## represents the angle of the complex point. The coefficient ##e## indicates the distance from the origin, while the complex exponential function separates the real and imaginary components. The final expression is confirmed as ##\log (e^{1+2i}) = 1 + i(2 + 2n\pi)##, with a note that the natural logarithm is not typically used in complex contexts. The discussion concludes that the method is valid despite some initial confusion regarding the use of the natural logarithm.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
Hello everyone,

I am asked to calculate ##\log (e^{1+2i})##, and I would appreciate it if someone could verify my calculation..

My textbook defines ##\log z## as ##\log z = \ln |z| + i \arg z##.

##\log (e^{1+2i}) = \ln |e^{1+2i}| + i \arg(e^{1+2i}) \iff##

##\log (e^{1 + 2i}) = \ln|e e^{2i}| + i \arg (e e^{2i}) \iff##

##\\log (e^{1+2i}) = \ln e + i \arg (e e^{2i}) \iff##

##\log (e^{1+2i}) = 1 + i \arg (e e^{2i})##

Here is the step that I am not entirely certain about. I know that ##e^{2i}## is the exponential representation of the complex point whose angle is ##2##. But I am wondering, would the coefficient ##e## just represent the distance of the complex point from the origin? More generally, the complex exponential function ##e^z## is defined as ##e^z = e^x e^{iy}##, and so ##e^x## would represent the distance of the complex point ##e^{iy}##?

If this is so, then the answer would seem to be

##\log (e^{1+2i}) = 1 + i(2 + 2 n \pi)##

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bashyboy said:
Hello everyone,

I am asked to calculate ##\log (e^{1+2i})##, and I would appreciate it if someone could verify my calculation..

My textbook defines ##\log z## as ##\log z = \ln |z| + i \arg z##.

##\log (e^{1+2i}) = \ln |e^{1+2i}| + i \arg(e^{1+2i}) \iff##

##\log (e^{1 + 2i}) = \ln|e e^{2i}| + i \arg (e e^{2i}) \iff##

##\\log (e^{1+2i}) = \ln e + i \arg (e e^{2i}) \iff##

##\log (e^{1+2i}) = 1 + i \arg (e e^{2i})##

Here is the step that I am not entirely certain about. I know that ##e^{2i}## is the exponential representation of the complex point whose angle is ##2##. But I am wondering, would the coefficient ##e## just represent the distance of the complex point from the origin? More generally, the complex exponential function ##e^z## is defined as ##e^z = e^x e^{iy}##, and so ##e^x## would represent the distance of the complex point ##e^{iy}##?

If this is so, then the answer would seem to be

##\log (e^{1+2i}) = 1 + i(2 + 2 n \pi)##

Is this correct?
Yes, but it is rather a long way about. You can straight away write down that one value of ln(ez) is z. The only question is what other values are there. If w is another value then w = ln(ez). Exponentiate both sides and see what develops.
 
I am not certain I see where the quantity ##\ln e^z## arises. If recall correctly, my professor said that we do not use the natural logarithm when dealing with complex numbers.
 
Bashyboy said:
I am not certain I see where the quantity ##\ln e^z## arises. If recall correctly, my professor said that we do not use the natural logarithm when dealing with complex numbers.
OK, I see - you have to start with the definition you quoted, and your method is fine.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K