Calculating compressed air system leakage

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on calculating leakage in a compressed air system using an Atlas Copco GA 75 compressor. The user attempts to apply the formula % Leakage = (Tx100) / (T+t), where T represents total load time and t represents unload time. However, the user identifies flaws in this approach, particularly in how load, unload, and OFF modes are treated in the calculation, leading to an inaccurate leakage estimate of 17.68%. Given the system's characteristics and the absence of prior leakage assessments, the user suspects actual leakage rates could be between 25-40%.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compressed air systems and their components
  • Familiarity with the Atlas Copco GA 75 compressor specifications
  • Knowledge of leakage calculation formulas and their variables
  • Experience with ultrasound equipment for detecting air leaks
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced leakage detection techniques using ultrasound equipment
  • Learn about best practices for conducting air leakage assessments in industrial settings
  • Investigate the impact of compressor load and unload cycles on system efficiency
  • Explore methods for optimizing compressed air systems to minimize leakage
USEFUL FOR

Maintenance engineers, facility managers, and anyone involved in the operation and optimization of compressed air systems will benefit from this discussion.

sagaris
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am looking to quanitfy our compressed air system leakage and have followed the usual steps of ensuring all air consuming products are off and then measuring load/unload times.

I intended to use the following formula as found in relevant articles and webpages:

% Leakage = (Tx100) / (T+t)​

where T = total load time
t = unload time

the problem is that our compressor (an Atlas Copco GA 75) has a load, unload and OFF mode (its NOT variable speed) and the only reference i can find that includes load, unload and off into the calculation quite crudley uses the above equation but bundles load and unload together as 'T' then the off mode as 't'.

doing this puts our losses at 17.68% but i am 99% positive this is incorrect, as we have 375 m of 3inch ring main that has never had any air leakage assesment and you can hear it leaking everywhere now that we are in shutdown and then much more so with our ultrasound equipment! apparently 10-15% leakage for a compressor system of our size is acceptable but this just doesn't seem right?! expected plant losses for somewhere that hasn't had leakage assesment before are typically around the 25-40% range.

the load, unload and off equation completely ignores the fact that load and unload are doing opposite things! the off is merely to save energy where as unload is to regulate the desired air pressure. if anything it should be OFF time and unload time together as at that point the rest of the system is not being fed and only the leaks are affecting the system pressure. But by putting unload and OFF times together means the calculation puts leakage at 7.58%...and that is 100% incorrect! (10% is considered a good level of leakage)

any ideas?

thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I should add that the GA 75 (75KW) compressor is one of two and there is an additional 90KW Variable speed drive compressor, so three in all. its just that this is the only time in the year where just one is running so the load, unload and off times can be measured.

with regards to calculating the system leakage it doesn't matter if one or all 3 compressors are running as the reciever is still being filled to the same pressure as during production, with the exception that there is no production load, so just the one can cope.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
18K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
22K
Replies
3
Views
3K