Calculating Crane Power with Constant Velocity: Two Homework Problems

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
alex7298
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2 problems.
1: A man lifts a 91kg person straight up a distance of 1.2m in 0.51s. What power is used to do this?

2: 3.00x10^2kg piano is lifted at a steady velocity from ground to a height of 10.0m. The crane doing the lifting has a steady power of 4.00x10^2W. What time does it take to do this?


Homework Equations


Both equations should be able to use P=Fd/t



The Attempt at a Solution


With both problems, the book states constant velocity so the F=ma=0, which doesn't make sense because that would make the answer 0.
Is there another way of finding force that i am forgetting?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alex7298 said:

Homework Statement


2 problems.
1: A man lifts a 91kg person straight up a distance of 1.2m in 0.51s. What power is used to do this?

2: 3.00x10^2kg piano is lifted at a steady velocity from ground to a height of 10.0m. The crane doing the lifting has a steady power of 4.00x10^2W. What time does it take to do this?


Homework Equations


Both equations should be able to use P=Fd/t



The Attempt at a Solution


With both problems, the book states constant velocity so the F=ma=0, which doesn't make sense because that would make the answer 0.
Is there another way of finding force that i am forgetting?
Thanks
That makes the net force and the net work = 0. But you're not looking for the net, you're looking for the work done by just one of the forces against gravity.
 
would I use GPE=mgh for the work?
so for problem 1: work=(91kg)(9.8)(1.2)=1070.16J===> P=1070.167J/0.51s=2098.366W?
 
alex7298 said:
would I use GPE=mgh for the work?
so for problem 1: work=(91kg)(9.8)(1.2)=1070.16J===> P=1070.167J/0.51s=2098.366W?
Yes, correct, as long as you understand why you are equating the work done by the man to the potential energy change of the person.