Calculating Crossbow Bolt Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter haxxorboi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bolt Velocity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the velocity of a crossbow bolt using the principles of potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE). The user initially calculated the velocity as 48.29 m/s but later corrected it to 34.14 m/s after realizing the need to account for energy loss during the release. The conversion of units was also highlighted, with specific attention to the significance of significant figures in the final answer. The final velocity of the bolt, considering the energy dynamics, is confirmed as 34.14 m/s.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of potential energy and kinetic energy principles
  • Basic knowledge of unit conversions (pounds to Newtons, inches to meters, ounces to kilograms)
  • Familiarity with significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Ability to apply basic physics equations in problem-solving
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Learn about significant figures and their importance in scientific calculations
  • Explore the effects of energy loss in real-world applications
  • Review the principles of projectile motion and its calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in the practical applications of energy conservation in projectile motion.

haxxorboi
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I should preface this, this may be the stupidest question yet on this forum. But I can't get it to work out right so I'm going wrong somewhere obvious I'm sure...

Homework Statement


A crossbow is readied for release. Suppose it takes 45.0 pounds of force to draw the arrow back by 13.0 inches, and the weight of the arrow is 2 ounces. What is the speed of the arrow when it is released?

(1 lb = 4.448 N; 1 in = 2.54 cm; 1 oz = 28.35 grams)


Homework Equations


PE=KE
Force*Distance=.5*mass*velocity^2


The Attempt at a Solution


45lb=200.16N
13in=.3302M
2oz=.0567kg

66.092832NM=66.09832J

66.09832J=.5*.0567*v^2
66.09832J=.02835*v^2
2331.5104=v^2
v=48.2857


Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force is only 45lbs at the end of the pull but it is zero at the point where the arrow leaves the string.
If you draw a force/distance diagram it's easy to see that you only get half the energy you calcualted.
 
Ah geez, me and my linear thinking. Yep, that was it.

Final answer: 34.141740036184633488266425671601 m/s

Thanks for the help mgb_phys! I appreciate it.
 
haxxorboi said:
Final answer: 34.141740036184633488266425671601 m/s
No it isn't
Knowing why that is a ridiculous answer is as important as knowing how to get it.
 
I guess I don't understand what you mean. The homework system I'm using gives feedback after you complete a problem and tells you whether you're correct or not. The answer I posted here was MScalc's output that I just copy & pasted. I inputted 34.142 m/s and it returned "You are correct. The computer's answer is 34.14 m/s"

What am I missing here? I understand there will never be 100% conservation of energy to give to the bolt, however this is a pretty basic physics course and most of the questions don't deal with any outside energy losses.
 
34.141740036184633488266425671601
You know the force and distance to 3 significant figures and the mass to 1, where do the 32 significant figures in the answer come from?

As an example, the size of an atom is about 0.0000000001m, you are quoting distance to an accuracy of 0.0000000000001 of a proton!
This isn't just being picky - it is completely unphysical to quote an answer like that.
 
haxxorboi said:
The answer I posted here was MScalc's output that I just copy & pasted. I inputted 34.142 m/s and it returned "You are correct. The computer's answer is 34.14 m/s"

I was just copy and pasting the rough answer I got from the calculator. This wasn't the actual answer I used. I really don't remember too much of Sig. Digits as the only time I used them was about 3 years ago in high school chemistry but either way my professor doesn't use them.

Was my extremely lengthy answer "correct", no. But was it, in it's rounded form that is, the answer I needed, yes.

In the future I'll attempt to answer in a more realistic format. Sorry about that.
 
haxxorboi said:
In the future I'll attempt to answer in a more realistic format. Sorry about that.
No problem - it wasn't anything personal I was just trying to make a point!
It's like getting the units right, there is an attitude of "thats what the calcualtor said - it must be right" that you have to get beyond.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
52
Views
13K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
14K