Calculating Distance Between Two Speakers Producing 180Hz Sound in Phase

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two speakers producing a 180Hz sound in phase, with a focus on calculating the distance to the further speaker based on the intensity observed at a specific point. The speed of sound in air is given as 345m/s.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the concept of wave interference and the need to consider relative phase to determine the intensity of combined waves. There are questions about the interpretation of terms like "intensity" and whether it refers to nodes or maxima.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various interpretations of the problem, with some suggesting that the missing word in the original post may clarify the context. There is an ongoing dialogue about the equations related to wave propagation and intensity, but no consensus has been reached on how to proceed with the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the definitions and equations related to intensity and wave interference, as well as the absence of specific information in the textbook that participants are referencing.

lilkrazyrae
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Two speakers produce a 180Hz sound in phase. If an intensity is located 2.10m from the nearer spearker, find the distance to the further speaker if the speed of sound in the air is 345m/s.

I don't understand exactly what this problem is asking for, and I can't find an equation relating these things. Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the question is asking you to take into account the interference between the two waves in order to determine the intensity of the combined waves at a given point. You know the speed of sound, the frequency and direction of travel for each of the waves along with the relative phase of the sources. You should be able to work out the relative phase at the observation point. :)
 
I don't understand our book doesn't say anything about the relative phase; therefore, I don't fully understand what you mean I gathered that the interference between the two waves was the point of the problem but I still don't quite understand it.
 
Actually, looking at your original statement again, there appears to be a word missing where you say "... an intensity is located ..." I think you mean to say there is an intensity node or maximum or something of that sort.

You are dealing with two waves presumably of equal source amplitude propagating in opposite directions. Before we proceed, have you seen anything like [itex]A \cos (kx - \omega t)[/itex] to describe wave propagation?
 
I did miss a word and it is intensity minimum and I found an equation similar to that one except it was Asin(kx+wt).
 
Okay. We have one thing left to decide. The A in [itex]A \sin (kx - \omega t)[/itex] represents the amplitude of the wave. I am going to assume (though it's not exactly correct) that the amplitude is a constant for your problem.

Notice that [itex]A \sin (kx - \omega t)[/itex] represents a wave traveling toward the right (toward increasing x) while [itex]A \sin (kx + \omega t)[/itex] travels to the left. Suppose the wave from the nearer speaker is located at x = 0 and is given by [itex]A \sin (kx - \omega t)[/itex]. We have to make a slight adjustment to describe the wave from the far speaker (besides just traveling in the opposite direction). Your problem stated that the speakers are in phase so if the second speaker is at x = L then its wave looks like [itex]A \sin (k(x-L) + \omega t)[/itex].

Therefore, the combined wave at any point is

[tex]A \left( \sin(kx -\omega t) + \sin(k(x-L) + \omega t)\right)[/tex]

Note that [itex]k = \frac {2\pi}{\lambda}[/itex] where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is the wavelength and [itex]\omega = 2 \pi f[/itex] where f is the frequency of the wave. You should also know that [itex]f \lambda = c_s[/itex] the speed of sound.

Can you write the intensity of the wave?
 
The only way I see to write the intensity uses mass, and I don't know the mass.
 
Ok so do you just solve for x and that is your other distance
 
No, you don't need a mass. Does your textbook tell you how to find the intensity of a wave or the intensity of combined waves?
 
  • #10
Well I have an intensity related to power equation, and I=I(1)+I(2)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K